Cited by 140COVID-19 and Mental HealthAging, Health, and DisabilityMental Health Treatment and Access

Experiences of American older adults with pre-existing depression during the beginnings of the covid-19 pandemic: A multicity, mixed-methods study.

Open access
Hamm, Megan E., Brown, Patrick J., Karp, Jordan F., Lenard, Emily, Cameron, Flor, Dawdani, Alicia, Lavretsky, Helen, Miller, J. Philip +5 more·2020·The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry

Abstract

Objective To determine the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on the mental health of older adults with pre-existing major depressive disorder (MDD).Participants Participants were 73 community-living older adults with pre-existing MDD (mean age 69 [SD 6]) in Los Angeles, New York, Pittsburgh, and St Louis.Design and measurements During the first 2 months of the pandemic, the authors interviewed participants with a semistructured qualitative interview evaluating access to care, mental health, quality of life, and coping. The authors also assessed depression, anxiety, and suicidality with validated scales and compared scores before and during the pandemic.Results Five themes from the interviews highlight the experience of older adults with MDD: 1) They are more concerned about the risk of contracting the virus than the risks of isolation. 2) They exhibit resilience to the stress and isolation of physical distancing. 3) Most are not isolated socially, with virtual contact with friends and family. 4) Their quality of life is lower, and they worry their mental health will suffer with continued physical distancing. 5) They are outraged by an inadequate governmental response to the pandemic. Depression, anxiety, and suicidal ideation symptom scores did not differ from scores before the pandemic.Conclusion Most older adults with pre-existing MDD show resilience in the first 2 months of the COVID-19 pandemic but have concerns about the future. Policies and interventions to provide access to medical services and opportunities for social interaction are needed to help to maintain mental health and quality of life as the pandemic continues.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jagp.2020.06.013

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Neither Hamm et al. (2020) nor Hamza et al. (2021) found clear evidence of increased risk of suicidal ideation (older adults) or NSSI (students) during the pandemic.

    “Neither Hamm et al., 2020 (trial participants with depression aged >60years) nor Hamza et al., 2021 (students) found clear evidence of increased risk of suicidal ideation (older adults) or NSSI (students) during the pandemic.”
  • Six studies present repeat survey data, with measures recorded during, as well as before, the pandemic.

    “Six studies present repeat survey data, with measures recorded during, as well as before, the pandemic ( Hamm et al., 2020; Hamza et al., 2021; Raifman et al., 2020; Winkler et al., 2020; Wu et al., 2020b; Zhang et al., 2020).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [18]Thompson M. How to form a COVID-19 social ‘bubble’ or ‘quaranteam’ with MIT Technology Review's Gideon Lichfield. [PBS Wesbsite] May 13, 2020. Available at: https://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/how-to-form-a-covid-19-social-bubble-or-quaranteam. Accessed June 2, 2020.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hamm, M. E., Brown, P. J., Karp, J. F., Lenard, E., Cameron, F., Dawdani, A., Lavretsky, H., Miller, J. P., Mulsant, B. H., Pham, V. T., Reynolds, C. F., Roose, S. P., & Lenze, E. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • New York State Psychiatric Institute (US)
  • Washington University in St. Louis (US)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
Corresponding author
Hamm, Megan E.
Venue
The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-09
Volume
28
Issue
9
Pages
924-932
ISSN
1064-7481 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3036710506
Cited by
139
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 47 · 2020: 9
FWCI
11.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
University of Pittsburgh's Department of Psychiatry
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Aging, Health, and Disability
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, older adults, major depressive disorder, mental health, social distancing, social isolation, resilience, quality of life, access to mental health care, anxiety, suicidal ideation, government pandemic response, community-dwelling older adults
MeSH terms
Betacoronavirus, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Aged, Anxiety, Major Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Male, Pneumonia, Viral, Quality of Life, United States, Comorbidity, Coronavirus Infections, Qualitative Research, Pandemics, Suicidal Ideation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review