Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 441

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 42 of the 42 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The prevalence of dementia in urban and rural areas of China

Jia, Jianping, Wang, Fen, Wei, Cuibai, Zhou, Aihong, Jia, Xiangfei, Li, Fang, Tang, Muni, Chu, Lan, Zhou, Youlong, Zhou, Chunkui, Cui, Yong, Wang, Qi, Wang, Weishan, Yin, Peng, Hu, Nan, Zuo, Xiumei, Song, Haiqing, Qin, Wei, Wu, Liyong, Li, Dan, Jia, Longfei, Song, Juexian, Han, Ying, Xing, Yi, Yang, Peijie, Li, Yuemei, Qiao, Yuchen, Tang, Yi, Lv, Jihui, Dong, Xiumin·2014·Alzheimer's & Dementia

Abstract

Objective: The Chinese population has been aging rapidly and the country's economy has experienced exponential growth during the past three decades. The goal of this study was to estimate the changes in the prevalence of dementia, Alzheimer's disease (AD), and vascular dementia (VaD) among elderly Chinese individuals and to analyze differences between urban and rural areas. Methods: For the years 2008 to 2009, we performed a population‐based cross‐sectional survey with a multistage cluster sampling design. Residents aged 65 years and older were drawn from 30 urban (n = 6096) and 45 rural (n = 4180) communities across China. Participants were assessed with a series of clinical examinations and neuropsychological measures. Dementia, AD, and VaD were diagnosed according to established criteria via standard diagnostic procedures. Results: The prevalence of dementia, AD, and VaD among individuals aged 65 years and older were 5.14% (95% CI, 4.71–5.57), 3.21% (95% CI, 2.87–3.55), and 1.50% (95% CI, 1.26–1.74), respectively. The prevalence of dementia was significantly higher in rural areas than in urban ones (6.05% vs. 4.40%, P < .001). The same regional difference was also seen for AD (4.25% vs. 2.44%, P < .001) but not for VaD (1.28% vs. 1.61%, P = .166). The difference in AD was not evident when the sample was stratified by educational level. Moreover, the risk factors for AD and VaD differed for urban and rural populations. Conclusions: A notably higher prevalence of dementia and AD was found in rural areas than in urban ones, and education might be an important reason for the urban–rural differences.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jalz.2013.01.012

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

1 retracted

Show all 42 references

Cited by

See all 441

Metadata

Authors
Jia, J., Wang, F., Wei, C., Zhou, A., Jia, X., Li, F., Tang, M., Chu, L., Zhou, Y., Zhou, C., Cui, Y., Wang, Q., Wang, W., Yin, P., Hu, N., Zuo, X., Song, H., Qin, W., Wu, L., Li, D., Jia, L., Song, J., Han, Y., Xing, Y., Yang, P., Li, Y., Qiao, Y., Tang, Y., Lv, J., & Dong, X.
Venue
Alzheimer's & Dementia
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-07-22
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
1-9
ISSN
  • 1552-5260 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-5279
OpenAlex
W2051388479
Cited by
441
References
42
FWCI
14.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The prevalence of dementia in urban and rural areas of China. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jalz.2013.01.012
The paper
Jia, J., Wang, F., Wei, C., Zhou, A., Jia, X., Li, F., Tang, M., Chu, L., Zhou, Y., Zhou, C., Cui, Y., Wang, Q., Wang, W., Yin, P., Hu, N., Zuo, X., Song, H., Qin, W., Wu, L., . . . Dong, X. (2014). The prevalence of dementia in urban and rural areas of China. Alzheimer's & Dementia. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalz.2013.01.012

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.