Cited by 129Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsCerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus

Alzheimer's disease biomarker‐guided diagnostic workflow using the added value of six combined cerebrospinal fluid candidates: Aβ1–42, total‐tau, phosphorylated‐tau, NFL, neurogranin, and YKL‐40

Hampel, Harald, Toschi, Nicola, Baldacci, Filippo, Zetterberg, Henrik, Blennow, Kaj, Kilimann, Ingo, Teipel, Stefan J., Cavedo, Enrica +9 more·2018·Alzheimer's & Dementia

Abstract

Introduction: The diagnostic and classificatory performances of all combinations of three core (amyloid β peptide [i.e., Aβ 1–42], total tau [t‐tau], and phosphorylated tau) and three novel (neurofilament light chain protein, neurogranin, and YKL‐40) cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers of neurodegeneration were compared among individuals with mild cognitive impairment (n = 41), Alzheimer's disease dementia (ADD; n = 35), frontotemporal dementia (FTD; n = 9), and cognitively healthy controls (HC; n = 21), using 10‐fold cross‐validation. Methods: The combinations ranking in the top 10 according to diagnostic accuracy in differentiating between distinct diagnostic categories were identified. Results: The single biomarkers or biomarker combinations generating the best area under the receiver operating characteristics (AUROCs) were the following: the combination [amyloid β peptide + phosphorylated tau + neurofilament light chain] for distinguishing between ADD patients and HC (AUROC = 0.86), t‐tau for distinguishing between ADD and FTD patients (AUROC = 0.82), and t‐tau for distinguishing between FTD patients and HC (AUROC = 0.78). Conclusions: Novel and established cerebrospinal fluid markers perform with at least fair accuracy in the discrimination between ADD and FTD. The classification of mild cognitive impairment individuals was poor.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jalz.2017.11.015

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Levels of various additional proteins have been suggested as endophenotypes for AD, the clinical and biological relevance of which remain to be elucidated.

    “along with levels of various additional proteins, the clinical and biological relevance of which remain to be elucidated [216–218].”

    From Genetic architecture of Alzheimer's disease (2020) · cites this paper as [216]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hampel, H., Toschi, N., Baldacci, F., Zetterberg, H., Blennow, K., Kilimann, I., Teipel, S. J., Cavedo, E., Melo dos Santos, A., Epelbaum, S., Lamari, F., Genthon, R., Dubois, B., Floris, R., Garaci, F., Lista, S., & (APMI), A. P. M. I.
Affiliations
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • University of Rome Tor Vergata (IT)
  • University of Pisa (IT)
  • Sahlgrenska University Hospital (SE)
  • University of Rostock (DE)
  • Sorbonne Université, AP‐HP, GRC n° 21 Alzheimer Precision Medicine (APM), Hôpital de la Pitié‐Salpêtrière Paris France
  • Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris (FR)
  • Sorbonne Université (FR)
Venue
Alzheimer's & Dementia
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-01-09
Volume
14
Issue
4
Pages
492-501
ISSN
  • 1552-5260 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-5279
OpenAlex
W2782731988
Cited by
129
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 11
FWCI
16.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Alzheimer s & Dementia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • CINECA IRIS Institutial research information system (University of Pisa) (submittedVersion)
  • Cineca Institutional Research Information System (Tor Vergata University) (submittedVersion)
  • DZNE Pub (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Pfizer
  • AXA Research Fund
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Cerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, frontotemporal dementia
MeSH terms
Chitinase-3-Like Protein 1, Aged, Alzheimer Disease, Cross-Sectional Studies, Diagnosis, Differential, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Nuclear Proteins, Peptide Fragments, Retrospective Studies, ROC Curve, Biomarkers, Amyloid beta-Peptides, RNA-Binding Proteins, tau Proteins, Neurofilament Proteins, Area Under Curve, Frontotemporal Dementia, Cognitive Dysfunction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review