The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Tau-positron emission tomography correlates with neuropathology findings.
Open accessAbstract
INTRODUCTION: Comparison of tau (flortaucipir) positron emission tomography (FTP-PET) to autopsy is important to demonstrate the relationship of FTP-PET to neuropathologic findings. METHODS: Autopsies were performed on 26 participants who had antemortem FTP-PET. FTP-PET standardized uptake value ratios (SUVRs) were compared to autopsy diagnoses and Braak tangle stage. Quantitative tau burden was compared to regional FTP-PET signal. RESULTS: Participants with Braak stages of IV or greater had elevated FTP-PET signal. FTP-PET was elevated in participants with Alzheimer's disease. An FTP-PET SUVR cut point of 1.29 was determined to be optimal. Quantitative measurements of hippocampal and temporal lobe tau burden were highly correlated to FTP-PET signal (rho's from 0.61 to 0.70, P ≤ .02). DISCUSSION: Elevated FTP-PET reflects Braak IV or greater neuropathology. Participants with primary age-related tauopathy and hippocampal sclerosis did not show elevated FTP-PET signal. Secondary neuropathologic diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease neuropathologic change can lead to borderline elevated FTP-PET signal.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Studies combining antemortem imaging with neuropathological validation have shown that 18F-flortaucipir PET is highly sensitive for presence of high levels of AD neuropathological change with visual rating positivity corresponding to Braak levels IV or greater [184, 185].”
From The use of neuroimaging techniques in the early and differential diagnosis of dementia (2023) · cites this paper as [185]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“In support of this finding and the quantitative data presented herein, a recent study of 26 cases comparing flortaucipir PET image and autopsy findings demonstrated a sensitivity of 87% and specificity of 82% for identifying AD-spectrum pathological diagnoses, using quantitative analysis of a mesial, inferior, or middle temporal lobe region of interest.25”
From Positron Emission Tomography Imaging With [ 18 F]flortaucipir and Postmortem Assessment of Alzheimer Disease Neuropathologic Changes (2020) · cites this paper as [25]
In the citing paper
“Studies comparing antemortem tau PET imaging with autopsy have begun assessing the ability of flortaucipir to detect underlying NFTs in AD and non-AD dementias.25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33”
From Positron Emission Tomography Imaging With [ 18 F]flortaucipir and Postmortem Assessment of Alzheimer Disease Neuropathologic Changes (2020) · cites this paper as [25]
In the citing paper
“Twelve of these autopsy-confirmed cases had pathological evidence of Braak stages IV to VI NFTs (2 cases with Braak stage IV) with moderate to frequent neuritic plaques and were above the SUVR threshold for positivity for the [18F]flortaucipir temporal lobe region of interest.”
From Positron Emission Tomography Imaging With [ 18 F]flortaucipir and Postmortem Assessment of Alzheimer Disease Neuropathologic Changes (2020) · cites this paper as [25]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E., & McHugh, P. R. (1975) · Journal of Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6 · Cited by 88,282
Neuropathological stageing of Alzheimer-related changes.
Braak, H., & Braak, E. (1991) · Acta Neuropathologica · doi:10.1007/bf00308809 · Cited by 16,123
pROC: an open-source package for R and S+ to analyze and compare ROC curves
Robin, X., Turck, N., Hainard, A., Tiberti, N., Lisacek, F., Sanchez, J.-C., & Müller, M. (2011) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/1471-2105-12-77 · Cited by 13,697
Mirra, S. S., Heyman, A., McKeel, D., Sumi, S. M., Crain, B. J., Brownlee, L. M., Vogel, F. S., Hughes, J. P., Belle, G. V., Berg, L., et al. (1991) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.41.4.479 · Cited by 4,961
Diagnosis and management of dementia with Lewy bodies: Fourth consensus report of the DLB Consortium
McKeith, I. G., Boeve, B. F., Dickson, D. W., Halliday, G., Taylor, J.-P., Weintraub, D., Aarsland, D., Galvin, J., Attems, J., Ballard, C. G., et al. (2017) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.0000000000004058 · Cited by 4,476
Self-citationBraak, H., Alafuzoff, I., Arzberger, T., Kretzschmar, H., & Del Tredici, K. (2006) · Acta Neuropathologica · doi:10.1007/s00401-006-0127-z · Cited by 3,172
Hyman, B. T., Phelps, C. H., Beach, T. G., Bigio, E. H., Cairns, N. J., Carrillo, M. C., Dickson, D. W., Duyckaerts, C., Frosch, M. P., Masliah, E., et al. (2012) · Alzheimer's & Dementia · doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2011.10.007 · Cited by 3,092
Self-citationMontine, T. J., Phelps, C. H., Beach, T. G., Bigio, E. H., Cairns, N. J., Dickson, D. W., Duyckaerts, C., Frosch, M. P., Masliah, E., Mirra, S. S., et al. (2012) · Acta Neuropathologica · doi:10.1007/s00401-011-0910-3 · Cited by 2,894 · cited 1×
“Mean (SD) 18 (8) 29 24 27 (2) 22 (6) 28 (1) 26 (4) 21 22 (7) GMWMPVCNPiB SUVR†”
Self-citationNelson, P. T., Alafuzoff, I., Bigio, E. H., Bouras, C., Braak, H., Cairns, N. J., Castellani, R. J., Crain, B. J., Davies, P., Tredici, K. D., et al. (2012) · Journal of Neuropathology & Experimental Neurology · doi:10.1097/nen.0b013e31825018f7 · Cited by 2,050
Primary age-related tauopathy (PART): a common pathology associated with human aging
Crary, J. F., Trojanowski, J. Q., Schneider, J. A., Abisambra, J. F., Abner, E. L., Alafuzoff, I., Arnold, S. E., Attems, J., Beach, T. G., Bigio, E. H., et al. (2014) · Acta Neuropathologica · doi:10.1007/s00401-014-1349-0 · Cited by 1,467
Self-citation
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Revised criteria for diagnosis and staging of Alzheimer's disease: Alzheimer's Association Workgroup
Jack, C. R., Andrews, J. S., Beach, T. G., Buracchio, T., Dunn, B., Graf, A., Hansson, O., Ho, C., Jagust, W., McDade, E., et al. (2024) · Alzheimer's & Dementia · doi:10.1002/alz.13859 · Cited by 2,803
Self-citationFour distinct trajectories of tau deposition identified in Alzheimer’s disease
Initiative, T. A. D. N., Vogel, J. W., Young, A. L., Oxtoby, N. P., Smith, R., Ossenkoppele, R., Strandberg, O. T., La Joie, R., Aksman, L. M., Grothe, M. J., et al. (2021) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-021-01309-6 · Cited by 741
Performance of plasma phosphorylated tau 181 and 217 in the community
Mielke, M. M., Dage, J. L., Frank, R. D., Algeciras-Schimnich, A., Knopman, D. S., Lowe, V. J., Bu, G., Vemuri, P., Graff-Radford, J., Jack, C. R., et al. (2022) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-022-01822-2 · Cited by 465
Self-citationFleisher, A. S., Pontecorvo, M. J., Devous, M. D., Lu, M., Arora, A. K., Truocchio, S. P., Aldea, P., Flitter, M., Locascio, T., Devine, M., et al. (2020) · JAMA Neurology · doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2020.0528 · Cited by 448
Self-citationMoloney, C. M., Lowe, V. J., & Murray, M. E. (2021) · Alzheimer s & Dementia · doi:10.1002/alz.12321 · Cited by 358
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Lowe, V. J., Lundt, E. S., Albertson, S. M., Min, H., Fang, P., Przybelski, S. A., Senjem, M. L., Schwarz, C. G., Kantarci, K., Boeve, B., Jones, D. T., Reichard, R. R., Tranovich, J. F., Hanna Al‐Shaikh, F. S., Knopman, D. S., Jack, C. R., Dickson, D. W., Petersen, R. C., & Murray, M. E.
- Affiliations
- Mayo Clinic (US)
- Department of Neuroscience Mayo Clinic Jacksonville FL USA
- Corresponding author
- Lowe, Val J.
- Murray, Melissa E.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Alzheimer's & Dementia
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2020-01-04
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 561-571
- ISSN
- 1552-5260 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-5279
- PMC
- PMC7067654
- OpenAlex
- W2991594523
- Cited by
- 203
- References
- 44
- Citations by year
- 2026: 26 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 18
- FWCI
- 15.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Alzheimer s & Dementia (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (P50 AG016574, R01 NS89757, R01 NS089544, R01 DC10367, R01 AG011378, R01 AG041851, R01 AG034676, R01 AG054449, R01 NS097495, U01 AG006786, R21 NS094489)
- Robert Wood Johnson Foundation
- Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
- Keywords
- tau PET, flortaucipir
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Alzheimer Disease, Autopsy, Brain, Female, Humans, Male, tau Proteins, Positron-Emission Tomography
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
