Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 323

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Prognostic factors in resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma: Analysis of actual 5-year survivors1

Cleary, Sean P., Gryfe, Robert, Guindi, Maha, Greig, Paul, Smith, Lloyd, Mackenzie, Robert, Strasberg, Steven, Hanna, Sherif, Taylor, Bryce, Langer, Bernard, Gallinger, Steven·2004·Journal of the American College of Surgeons

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pancreatic cancer is a rapidly fatal disease with very few 5-year survivors even after aggressive surgical treatment. Our objective was to determine the actual 5-year survival rate of patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma who underwent a resection with curative intent in 5 teaching hospitals within the University of Toronto system. We then sought to determine clinical and histopathologic features of 5-year survivors to determine factors associated with a favorable prognosis. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective chart review was performed using surgeon and hospital databases to identify patients who had a surgical resection for pancreatic adenocarcinoma between January 1, 1988, and December 31, 1996. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-three patients who had a resection and a pathologic diagnosis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma with complete followup were identified from seven surgical practices. Mean survival (+/- standard error) in this series was 31.7 +/- 3.5 months (median 13.6 months). There were 18 5-year survivors (14.6%), including 5 patients (4.1%) who survived longer than 10 years. The survivors included 13 patients who had undergone a Whipple resection, 4 who had undergone a distal pancreatectomy, and 1 who had undergone a total pancreatectomy. Tumor size, lack of jaundice at presentation, negative nodal disease, low tumor grade, and a low tumor stage were all significant predictors of survival in univariate analysis (all p < 0.05). Only tumor stage (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval]: stage IIA 1.5 [0.8 to 2.8], stage IIB 2.6 [1.4 to 4.7], stage III 1.8 [0.8 to 4.3]) and tumor grade (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval]: moderately differentiated 1.6 [0.9 to 2.9], and poorly differentiated 3.1 [1.6 to 6.2]) were independently associated with survival differences in a multivariate Cox proportional hazards model. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that longterm survival from pancreatic adenocarcinoma is possible if the disease is identified in its early stages. These and other similar data should provide further stimulus for the development and evaluation of novel screening strategies to improve early detection of this disease.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2004.01.008

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 24 references

Cited by

See all 323

Metadata

Authors
Cleary, S. P., Gryfe, R., Guindi, M., Greig, P., Smith, L., Mackenzie, R., Strasberg, S., Hanna, S., Taylor, B., Langer, B., & Gallinger, S.
Venue
Journal of the American College of Surgeons
Published
2004-05
Volume
198
Issue
5
Pages
722-731
ISSN
1072-7515 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2115073791
Cited by
323
References
24
FWCI
5.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prognostic factors in resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma: Analysis of actual 5-year survivors1. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2004.01.008
The paper
Cleary, S. P., Gryfe, R., Guindi, M., Greig, P., Smith, L., Mackenzie, R., Strasberg, S., Hanna, S., Taylor, B., Langer, B., & Gallinger, S. (2004). Prognostic factors in resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma: Analysis of actual 5-year survivors1. Journal of the American College of Surgeons. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2004.01.008

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.