Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 249

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Laparoscopic Pancreaticoduodenectomy: Technique and Outcomes

Palanivelu, Chinnasamy, Jani, Kalpesh, Senthilnathan, Palanisamy, Parthasarathi, Ramasamy, Rajapandian, Subbaiah, Madhankumar, Madathupalayam Velusamy·2007·Journal of the American College of Surgeons

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We describe our experience with laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy, including 5-year actuarial survival rates. STUDY DESIGN: This is a retrospective study of selected patients who underwent laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy at a single center between 1998 and 2006. We have described the salient features of our technique and followup protocol. Patient characteristics, histologic variety of the tumor, resection margins, morbidity, mortality, and actuarial survival rates were studied. RESULTS: The procedure could be completed laparoscopically with tumor-free margins in all patients, including patients with ampullary carcinoma (n = 24), pancreatic cystadenocarcinoma (n = 4), pancreatic head adenocarcinoma (n = 9), low common bile duct cancer (n = 3), and two patients with chronic pancreatitis with a suspicious mass lesion in the head of pancreas. Mean age of patients was 61 years (range 28 to 70 years). There was a single perioperative mortality. Overall followup rate was 95.1%, with two patients lost to followup at 22 and 36 months. Among the survivors, two patients have metastatic disease and local recurrence developed in one patient. Five-year actuarial survival rates for all patients with malignancy, ampullary adenocarcinoma, pancreatic cystadenocarcinoma, pancreatic head adenocarcinoma, and common bile duct adenocarcinoma are 32%, 30.7%, 33.3%, 19.1%, and 50%, respectively. Presence of microscopic lymph node involvement is associated with poor survival, although operations in the setting of chronic pancreatitis resulted in increased morbidity. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy can be performed with safety and good results in properly selected patients. Localized malignant lesions, irrespective of histopathology, are particularly amenable to this approach.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.04.004

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 249

Metadata

Authors
Palanivelu, C., Jani, K., Senthilnathan, P., Parthasarathi, R., Rajapandian, S., & Madhankumar, M. V.
Venue
Journal of the American College of Surgeons
Published
2007-08
Volume
205
Issue
2
Pages
222-230
ISSN
1072-7515 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2057415364
Cited by
249
References
0
FWCI
6.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Laparoscopic Pancreaticoduodenectomy: Technique and Outcomes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.04.004
The paper
Palanivelu, C., Jani, K., Senthilnathan, P., Parthasarathi, R., Rajapandian, S., & Madhankumar, M. V. (2007). Laparoscopic Pancreaticoduodenectomy: Technique and Outcomes. Journal of the American College of Surgeons. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.04.004

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.