The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Laparoscopic vs Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy: Overall Outcomes and Severity of Complications Using the Accordion Severity Grading System
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Minimal access surgery techniques have evolved to include complex surgical procedures. Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) is a complex operation that pancreas surgeons have been slow to adopt. This article reviews our experience with patients undergoing LPD and compares their outcomes with those of patients undergoing open pancreaticoduodenectomy (OPD). STUDY DESIGN: All patients undergoing OPD or LPD during a 6-year period (2005-2011) were included. Results from the 2 groups were compared for mortality and morbidity according to the Accordion Severity Grading System. Oncologic markers, including margins of resection, transfusions received, number of lymph nodes, and lymph node ratio, were also compared. RESULTS: During the study time period, 215 and 53 patients underwent OPD and LPD, respectively. No differences were seen in patient demographics, comorbidities, American Society of Anesthesiologists grade, or pathology. Significant differences favoring LPD were seen in intraoperative blood loss (p < 0.001), transfusions (p < 0.001), length of hospital stay (p < 0.001), and length of ICU stay (p < 0.001). Operative time was significantly longer for LPD (p < 0.001). There were no differences in overall complications, pancreas fistula, or delayed gastric emptying. Oncologic outcomes demonstrated no significant differences in resection margins, size of tumor, or T/N stages. There were significant differences in number of lymph nodes retrieved (p = 0.007) and lymph node ratio (p < 0.001) in favor of LPD. CONCLUSIONS: This series demonstrates that LPD appears to be safe and feasible, with benefits over the open counterpart. However, the increased complexity and effort demanded by the technique pose the need for multi-institutional series and standardization in reporting. The goal should be to assess if LPD can result in a better procedure with better outcomes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Postoperative pancreatic fistula: An international study group (ISGPF) definition
Bassi, C., Dervenis, C., Butturini, G., Fingerhut, A., Yeo, C., Izbicki, J., Neoptolemos, J., Sarr, M., Traverso, W., & Buchler, M. (2005) · Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.surg.2005.05.001 · Cited by 4,277
Wente, M. N., Bassi, C., Dervenis, C., Fingerhut, A., Gouma, D. J., Izbicki, J. R., Neoptolemos, J. P., Padbury, R. T., Sarr, M. G., Traverso, L. W., et al. (2007) · Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.surg.2007.05.005 · Cited by 3,053
Wente, M. N., Veit, J. A., Bassi, C., Dervenis, C., Fingerhut, A., Gouma, D. J., Izbicki, J. R., Neoptolemos, J. P., Padbury, R. T., Sarr, M. G., et al. (2007) · Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.surg.2007.02.001 · Cited by 2,616
The Accordion Severity Grading System of Surgical Complications
Strasberg, S. M., Linehan, D. C., & Hawkins, W. G. (2009) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/sla.0b013e3181afde41 · Cited by 679
Prognostic relevance of lymph node ratio following pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer
Pawlik, T. M., Gleisner, A. L., Cameron, J. L., Winter, J. M., Assumpcao, L., Lillemoe, K. D., Wolfgang, C., Hruban, R. H., Schulick, R. D., Yeo, C. J., et al. (2007) · Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.surg.2006.12.013 · Cited by 452
Tran, K. T. C., Smeenk, H. G., van Eijck, C. H. J., Kazemier, G., Hop, W. C., Greve, J. W. G., Terpstra, O. T., Zijlstra, J. A., Klinkert, P., & Jeekel, H. (2004) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/01.sla.0000143248.71964.29 · Cited by 416
Total Laparoscopic Pancreaticoduodenectomy: Feasibility and Outcome in an Early Experience
Kendrick, M. L., & Cusati, D. (2010) · Archives of Surgery · doi:10.1001/archsurg.2009.243 · Cited by 352
Howard, T. J., Krug, J. E., Yu, J., Zyromski, N. J., Schmidt, C. M., Jacobson, L. E., Madura, J. A., Wiebke, E. A., & Lillemoe, K. D. (2006) · Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.gassur.2006.09.008 · Cited by 319
Corsini, M. M., Miller, R. C., Haddock, M. G., Donohue, J. H., Farnell, M. B., Nagorney, D. M., Jatoi, A., McWilliams, R. R., Kim, G. P., Bhatia, S., et al. (2008) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2007.15.8782 · Cited by 270
Laparoscopic Pancreaticoduodenectomy: Technique and Outcomes
Palanivelu, C., Jani, K., Senthilnathan, P., Parthasarathi, R., Rajapandian, S., & Madhankumar, M. V. (2007) · Journal of the American College of Surgeons · doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.04.004 · Cited by 249
Cited by
Total pancreatectomy: Short- and long-term outcomes at a high-volume pancreas center
Zakaria, H. M., Stauffer, J. A., Raimondo, M., Woodward, T. A., Wallace, M. B., & Asbun, H. J. (2016) · World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery · doi:10.4240/wjgs.v8.i9.634 · Cited by 42
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Asbun, H. J., & Stauffer, J. A.
- Venue
- Journal of the American College of Surgeons
- Published
- 2012-12
- Volume
- 215
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 810-819
- ISSN
- 1072-7515 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2026633398
- Cited by
- 395
- References
- 13
- FWCI
- 15.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Laparoscopic vs Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy: Overall Outcomes and Severity of Complications Using the Accordion Severity Grading System. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.08.006
- The paper
- Asbun, H. J., & Stauffer, J. A. (2012). Laparoscopic vs Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy: Overall Outcomes and Severity of Complications Using the Accordion Severity Grading System. Journal of the American College of Surgeons. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.08.006
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
