The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Anastomotic Leakage after Elective Right Versus Left Colectomy for Cancer: Prevalence and Independent Risk Factors
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery remains a major challenge because of its early and late consequences. STUDY DESIGN: To determine whether prevalence and risk factors for anastomotic leakage (AL) differed between right and left elective colectomy for cancer, we conducted univariate and multivariate analyses and compared 33 variables (15 preoperative, 18 intraoperative) culled prospectively for 520 right and 1,230 left colectomies, followed by immediate anastomosis in 1,750 adult patients with or without AL. RESULTS: The overall AL rate was 4% (71 of 1,750) and was significantly lower (p < 0.0001) for right (7 of 520=1.35%) than for left colectomy (64 of 1,230=5.20%). Overall mortality was 4.1% (68 of 1,750), and was not statistically different (p=0.50) between right (4.6%, 24 of 520) and left (3.6%, 44 of 1,230)) colectomy. In right colectomy, differences in associated mortality rates with (14.3%, 1 of 7) and without (4.5%, 23 of 513) AL were not statistically significant (p=0.28), but in left colectomy, associated mortality was statistically significantly higher (p < 0.006) with AL (10.9%, 7 of 64) than without it (3.2%, 37 of 1,166). Independent risk factors for AL were preoperative in right colectomy: loss of weight (> 10%), odds ratio (OR)=5.62, with 95% CI 1.06 to 29.8; and intraoperative in left colectomy: palliative resection (OR=2.12; 95% CI 1.06 to 4.23), "poor" colonic cleanliness (OR=2.4; 95% CI 1.34 to 4.28), proximal colorectal anastomosis (OR=1.34; 95% CI 1 to 1.8), and distal colorectal anastomosis (OR=3.91; 95% CI 1.64 to 9.81). CONCLUSIONS: In right colectomy for cancer, preoperative nutritive support leading to regain of lost weight could reduce postoperative morbidity. Concerning left colectomy, if colonic cleanliness is poor, intraoperative colonic lavage should be done. When poor colonic cleanliness is associated with palliative resection and low distal rectal anastomosis, a protective stoma should be considered.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
2017 WSES guidelines on colon and rectal cancer emergencies: obstruction and perforation
Pisano, M., Zorcolo, L., Merli, C., Cimbanassi, S., Poiasina, E., Ceresoli, M., Agresta, F., Allievi, N., Bellanova, G., Coccolini, F., et al. (2018) · World Journal of Emergency Surgery · doi:10.1186/s13017-018-0192-3 · Cited by 396
Pommergaard, H. ‐., Gessler, B., Burcharth, J., Angenete, E., Haglind, E., & Rosenberg, J. (2014) · Colorectal Disease · doi:10.1111/codi.12618 · Cited by 253
Matsui, A., Winer, J. H., Laurence, R. G., & Frangioni, J. V. (2011) · British Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1002/bjs.7698 · Cited by 69
Metadata
- Authors
- Veyrie, N., Ata, T., Muscari, F., Couchard, A.-C., Msika, S., Hay, J.-M., Fingerhut, A., & Dziri, C.
- Venue
- Journal of the American College of Surgeons
- Published
- 2007-12
- Volume
- 205
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 785-793
- ISSN
- 1072-7515 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2002279651
- Cited by
- 170
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Anastomotic Leakage after Elective Right Versus Left Colectomy for Cancer: Prevalence and Independent Risk Factors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.06.284
- The paper
- Veyrie, N., Ata, T., Muscari, F., Couchard, A.-C., Msika, S., Hay, J.-M., Fingerhut, A., & Dziri, C. (2007). Anastomotic Leakage after Elective Right Versus Left Colectomy for Cancer: Prevalence and Independent Risk Factors. Journal of the American College of Surgeons. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.06.284
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.