Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 351

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

General Surgical Operative Duration Is Associated with Increased Risk-Adjusted Infectious Complication Rates and Length of Hospital Stay

Procter, Levi D., Davenport, Daniel L., Bernard, Andrew C., Zwischenberger, Joseph B.·2010·Journal of the American College of Surgeons

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Studies of specific procedures have shown increases in infectious complications with operative duration. We hypothesized that operative duration is independently associated with increased risk-adjusted infectious complication (IC) rates in a broad range of general surgical procedures. STUDY DESIGN: We queried the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database for general surgical operations performed from 2005 to 2007. ICs (wound infection, sepsis, urinary tract infection, and/or pneumonia) and length of hospital stay (LOS) were evaluated versus operative duration (OD, ie, incision to closure). Multivariable regression adjusted for 38 patient risk variables, operation type and complexity, wound class and intraoperative transfusion. We also analyzed isolated laparoscopic cholecystectomies in patients of American Society of Anesthesiologists class 1 or 2, without intraoperative transfusion and with a clean or clean-contaminated wound class. RESULTS: In 299,359 operations performed at 173 hospitals, unadjusted IC rates increased linearly with OD at a rate of close to 2.5% per half hour (chi-square test for linear trend, p < 0.001). After adjustment, IC risk increased for each half hour of OD relative to cases lasting <or=1 hour, almost doubling at 2.1 to 2.5 hours (odds ratio = 1.92; 95% CI, 1.82 to 2.03; p < 0.001). In isolated laparoscopic cholecystectomy, IC rates increased linearly with OD (n = 17,018, chi-square test for linear trend, p < 0.001) with rates for 1.1 to 1.5 hour cases (1.4%) doubling those lasting <or=0.5 hour (0.7%). Across all procedures, adjusted LOS increased geometrically with operative duration at a rate of about 6% per half hour (coefficient for natural log transformed LOS = 0.059 per half hour; 95% CI, 0.058 to 0.060; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Operative duration is independently associated with increased ICs and LOS after adjustment for procedure and patient risk factors.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2009.09.034

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 351

Metadata

Authors
Procter, L. D., Davenport, D. L., Bernard, A. C., & Zwischenberger, J. B.
Venue
Journal of the American College of Surgeons
Published
2010-01
Volume
210
Issue
1
Pages
60-65e2
ISSN
1072-7515 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1980776714
Cited by
351
References
1
FWCI
4.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: General Surgical Operative Duration Is Associated with Increased Risk-Adjusted Infectious Complication Rates and Length of Hospital Stay. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2009.09.034
The paper
Procter, L. D., Davenport, D. L., Bernard, A. C., & Zwischenberger, J. B. (2010). General Surgical Operative Duration Is Associated with Increased Risk-Adjusted Infectious Complication Rates and Length of Hospital Stay. Journal of the American College of Surgeons. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2009.09.034

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.