Cited by 1,504Bariatric Surgery and OutcomesSurgical Simulation and TrainingHealthcare Quality and Management

Surgical skill and complication rates after bariatric surgery

Open access
Birkmeyer, John D., Finks, Jonathan F., O'Reilly, Amanda, Oerline, Mary, Carlin, Arthur M., Nunn, Andre R., Dimick, Justin, Banerjee, Mousumi +1 more·2013·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Clinical outcomes after many complex surgical procedures vary widely across hospitals and surgeons. Although it has been assumed that the proficiency of the operating surgeon is an important factor underlying such variation, empirical data are lacking on the relationships between technical skill and postoperative outcomes. METHODS: We conducted a study involving 20 bariatric surgeons in Michigan who participated in a statewide collaborative improvement program. Each surgeon submitted a single representative videotape of himself or herself performing a laparoscopic gastric bypass. Each videotape was rated in various domains of technical skill on a scale of 1 to 5 (with higher scores indicating more advanced skill) by at least 10 peer surgeons who were unaware of the identity of the operating surgeon. We then assessed relationships between these skill ratings and risk-adjusted complication rates, using data from a prospective, externally audited, clinical-outcomes registry involving 10,343 patients. RESULTS: Mean summary ratings of technical skill ranged from 2.6 to 4.8 across the 20 surgeons. The bottom quartile of surgical skill, as compared with the top quartile, was associated with higher complication rates (14.5% vs. 5.2%, P<0.001) and higher mortality (0.26% vs. 0.05%, P=0.01). The lowest quartile of skill was also associated with longer operations (137 minutes vs. 98 minutes, P<0.001) and higher rates of reoperation (3.4% vs. 1.6%, P=0.01) and readmission (6.3% vs. 2.7%) (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The technical skill of practicing bariatric surgeons varied widely, and greater skill was associated with fewer postoperative complications and lower rates of reoperation, readmission, and visits to the emergency department. Although these findings are preliminary, they suggest that peer rating of operative skill may be an effective strategy for assessing a surgeon's proficiency.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmsa1300625

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Birkmeyer, J. D., Finks, J. F., O'Reilly, A., Oerline, M., Carlin, A. M., Nunn, A. R., Dimick, J., Banerjee, M., & Birkmeyer, N. J. O.
Affiliations
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • Henry Ford Health (US)
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2013-10-10
Volume
369
Issue
15
Pages
1434-1442
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2023276160
Cited by
1,504
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 93 · 2025: 105 · 2024: 120 · 2023: 129 · 2022: 145 · 2021: 134 · 2020: 143 · 2019: 108 · 2018: 103 · 2017: 121 · 2016: 130 · 2015: 99 · 2014: 69 · 2013: 5
FWCI
99.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • New England Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Surgical Simulation and Training
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Healthcare Quality and Management
Keywords
bariatric surgery, laparoscopic gastric bypass, surgical skills, peer ratings, postoperative complications, surgical proficiency, risk-adjusted outcomes, hospital variation, reoperation, hospital readmission, operative time, mortality
MeSH terms
Adult, Clinical Competence, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Postoperative Complications, General Surgery, Risk Adjustment, Bariatric Surgery

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review