Unconscious Race and Class Biases among Registered Nurses: Vignette-Based Study Using Implicit Association Testing
Abstract
Background Implicit bias is an unconscious preference for a specific social group that can have adverse consequences for patient care. Acute care clinical vignettes were used to examine whether implicit race or class biases among registered nurses (RNs) impacted patient-management decisions. Study design In a prospective study conducted among surgical RNs at the Johns Hopkins Hospital, participants were presented 8 multi-stage clinical vignettes in which patients' race or social class were randomly altered. Registered nurses were administered implicit association tests (IATs) for social class and race. Ordered logistic regression was then used to examine associations among treatment differences, race, or social class, and RN's IAT scores. Spearman's rank coefficients comparing RN's implicit (IAT) and explicit (stated) preferences were also investigated. Results Two hundred and forty-five RNs participated. The majority were female (n=217 [88.5%]) and white (n=203 [82.9%]). Most reported that they had no explicit race or class preferences (n=174 [71.0%] and n=108 [44.1%], respectively). However, only 36 nurses (14.7%) demonstrated no implicit race preference as measured by race IAT, and only 16 nurses (6.53%) displayed no implicit class preference on the class IAT. Implicit association tests scores did not statistically correlate with vignette-based clinical decision making. Spearman's rank coefficients comparing implicit (IAT) and explicit preferences also demonstrated no stat…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Three of these studies reported that 90.7% of doctors (n=215), 93% of nurses (n=245) and 86% of medical students (n=211) demonstrated an implicit preference towards people with High SES.
“Three of these studies reported that 90.7% of doctors (n=215)28, 93% of nurses (n=245)29 and 86% of medical students (n=211)27 demonstrated an implicit preference towards people with High SES.”
From Health professionals implicit bias of patients with low socioeconomic status (SES) and its effects on clinical decision-making: a scoping review (2024) · cites this paper as [29]
In these studies, the high levels of implicit SES bias were not evident in HP's decision-making.
“However, in these studies,27–29 the high levels of implicit SES bias were not evident in HP’s decision-making.”
From Health professionals implicit bias of patients with low socioeconomic status (SES) and its effects on clinical decision-making: a scoping review (2024) · cites this paper as [29]
Cites
The effect of patient race and socio-economic status on physicians' perceptions of patients
van Ryn, M., & Burke, J. (2000) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0277-9536(99)00338-x · Cited by 1,509 · see citing works
Patient-Centered Communication, Ratings of Care, and Concordance of Patient and Physician Race
Cooper, L. A., Roter, D. L., Johnson, R. L., Ford, D. E., Steinwachs, D. M., & Powe, N. R. (2003) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-139-11-200312020-00009 · Cited by 1,371 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Zack, T., Lehman, E., Suzgun, M., Rodriguez, J. A., Celi, L. A., Gichoya, J., Jurafsky, D., Szolovits, P., Bates, D. W., Abdulnour, R.-E. E., et al. (2024) · The Lancet Digital Health · doi:10.1016/s2589-7500(23)00225-x · Cited by 510 · see citing works
Zestcott, C. A., Blair, I. V., & Stone, J. (2016) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/1368430216642029 · Cited by 381 · see citing works
ChatGPT for Clinical Vignette Generation, Revision, and Evaluation
Benoit, J. R. A. (2023) · doi:10.1101/2023.02.04.23285478 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
Health Literacy: Exploring Nursing Challenges to Providing Support and Understanding
Wittenberg, E., Ferrell, B., Kanter, E., & Buller, H. (2018) · Clinical Journal of Oncology Nursing · doi:10.1188/18.cjon.53-61 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
Anastas, T. M., Miller, M. M., Hollingshead, N. A., Stewart, J. C., Rand, K. L., & Hirsh, A. T. (2020) · Annals of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1093/abm/kaaa016 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Job, C., Adenipekun, B., Cleves, A., Gill, P., & Samuriwo, R. (2024) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081723 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
- Authors
- Haider, A. H., Schneider, E. B., Sriram, N., Scott, V. K., Swoboda, S. M., Zogg, C. K., Dhiman, N., Haut, E. R., Efron, D. T., Pronovost, P. J., Freischlag, J. A., Lipsett, P. A., Cornwell, E. E., MacKenzie, E. J., & Cooper, L. A.
- Affiliations
- Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- Howard University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Haider, Adil H.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of the American College of Surgeons
- Published
- 2015-06
- Volume
- 220
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1077-1086e3
- ISSN
- 1072-7515 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2155637702
- Cited by
- 112
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5
- FWCI
- 31.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of the American College of Surgeons (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- eCommons - AKU (Aga Khan University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (K24HL083113)
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (K23GM093112)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Cultural Competency in Health Care
- Keywords
- implicit bias, racial bias, social class bias, registered nurses, surgical nursing, clinical decision-making, clinical management, Implicit Association Test, explicit preferences, racial disparities in health care
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Association, Attitude of Health Personnel, Black or African American, Decision Making, Female, Humans, Male, Maryland, Middle Aged, Nurses, Prospective Studies, Psychological Tests, Social Class, Unconscious, Psychology, Logistic Models, White People, Healthcare Disparities, Racism
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review