Cited by 112Social and Intergroup PsychologyRacial and Ethnic Identity ResearchCultural Competency in Health Care

Unconscious Race and Class Biases among Registered Nurses: Vignette-Based Study Using Implicit Association Testing

Haider, Adil H., Schneider, Eric B., Sriram, N., Scott, Valerie K., Swoboda, Sandra M., Zogg, Cheryl K., Dhiman, Nitasha, Haut, Elliott R. +7 more·2015·Journal of the American College of Surgeons

Abstract

Background Implicit bias is an unconscious preference for a specific social group that can have adverse consequences for patient care. Acute care clinical vignettes were used to examine whether implicit race or class biases among registered nurses (RNs) impacted patient-management decisions. Study design In a prospective study conducted among surgical RNs at the Johns Hopkins Hospital, participants were presented 8 multi-stage clinical vignettes in which patients' race or social class were randomly altered. Registered nurses were administered implicit association tests (IATs) for social class and race. Ordered logistic regression was then used to examine associations among treatment differences, race, or social class, and RN's IAT scores. Spearman's rank coefficients comparing RN's implicit (IAT) and explicit (stated) preferences were also investigated. Results Two hundred and forty-five RNs participated. The majority were female (n=217 [88.5%]) and white (n=203 [82.9%]). Most reported that they had no explicit race or class preferences (n=174 [71.0%] and n=108 [44.1%], respectively). However, only 36 nurses (14.7%) demonstrated no implicit race preference as measured by race IAT, and only 16 nurses (6.53%) displayed no implicit class preference on the class IAT. Implicit association tests scores did not statistically correlate with vignette-based clinical decision making. Spearman's rank coefficients comparing implicit (IAT) and explicit preferences also demonstrated no stat…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.01.065

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Haider, A. H., Schneider, E. B., Sriram, N., Scott, V. K., Swoboda, S. M., Zogg, C. K., Dhiman, N., Haut, E. R., Efron, D. T., Pronovost, P. J., Freischlag, J. A., Lipsett, P. A., Cornwell, E. E., MacKenzie, E. J., & Cooper, L. A.
Affiliations
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • Howard University (US)
Corresponding author
Haider, Adil H.
Venue
Journal of the American College of Surgeons
Published
2015-06
Volume
220
Issue
6
Pages
1077-1086e3
ISSN
1072-7515 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2155637702
Cited by
112
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5
FWCI
31.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the American College of Surgeons (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eCommons - AKU (Aga Khan University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (K24HL083113)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (K23GM093112)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Cultural Competency in Health Care
Keywords
implicit bias, racial bias, social class bias, registered nurses, surgical nursing, clinical decision-making, clinical management, Implicit Association Test, explicit preferences, racial disparities in health care
MeSH terms
Adult, Association, Attitude of Health Personnel, Black or African American, Decision Making, Female, Humans, Male, Maryland, Middle Aged, Nurses, Prospective Studies, Psychological Tests, Social Class, Unconscious, Psychology, Logistic Models, White People, Healthcare Disparities, Racism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review