Cited by 81Health Literacy and Information AccessibilityPatient-Provider Communication in HealthcareInterpreting and Communication in Healthcare

Health Literacy: Exploring Nursing Challenges to Providing Support and Understanding

Open access
Wittenberg, Elaine, Ferrell, Betty, Kanter, Elisa, Buller, Haley·2018·Clinical Journal of Oncology Nursing

Abstract

BACKGROUND: As patient advocates, oncology nurses must attend to varying levels of health literacy among patients and families. However, little is known about nurses' experiences and comfort with health literacy assessment and providing health literacy support. . OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study is to explore nurse communication and patient health literacy. . METHODS: A cross-sectional survey design (N = 74) was used to explore nurse communication challenges with low-literacy patients and to measure nurses' frequency of assisting with patient literacy needs, perceived degree of difficulty communicating with low-literacy populations, and perceived comfort with health literacy support. . FINDINGS: A majority of the nurses reported communication challenges with patients who spoke English as a second language. Oncology nurses did not identify patient communication behaviors that indicated low health literacy. Nurses were least comfortable identifying low-literacy patients and assessing a patient's health literacy level. More experienced nurses reported more difficulty with low-literacy populations than less experienced nurses. Providing health literacy support to patients should be a core nursing skill.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1188/18.cjon.53-61

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Patients with low health literacy usually face obstacles in engaging with the healthcare system, including difficulties completing questionnaires, understanding clinicians' professional terms and language, and knowing when to return for follow-up care.

    “Patients with low health literacy usually face obstacles in engaging with the healthcare system, including difficulties completing questionnaires [55], understanding clinicians’ professional terms and language [56,57], and knowing when to return for follow-up care [58,59].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 38 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Eadie C 2014 Health literacy: A conceptual review Med-Surg Matters 23 1 13
  2. Welch VL VanGeest JB Caskey R 2011 Time, costs, and clinical utilization of screening for health literacy: A case study using the Newest Vital Sign (NVS) instrument Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine: JABFM 24 281 289 10.3122/jabfm.2011.03.100212 21551400 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wittenberg, E., Ferrell, B., Kanter, E., & Buller, H.
Affiliations
  • City Of Hope National Medical Center (US)
  • Chapman University (US)
Venue
Clinical Journal of Oncology Nursing
Published
2018-02-01
Volume
22
Issue
1
Pages
53-61
ISSN
  • 1092-1095 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-067X
OpenAlex
W2783696070
Cited by
81
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 2
FWCI
10.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical journal of oncology nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Cancer Institute (R25CA174627)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare
Keywords
health literacy, oncology nursing, nurse-patient communication, low-literacy patients, English as a second language, health literacy assessment, nurse comfort, nurses' experiences, patient advocacy, family caregivers
MeSH terms
Adult, Communication, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Nurse-Patient Relations, Oncology Nursing, Patient Education as Topic, Professional-Family Relations, Surveys and Questionnaires, Terminal Care, United States, Health Literacy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review