Cited by 178Health disparities and outcomesHealthcare Policy and ManagementGlobal Health and Surgery

Disparities in surgical access: a systematic literature review, conceptual model, and evidence map

Open access
de Jager, Elzerie, Levine, Adele A., Udyavar, Rhea N., Burstin, Helen R., Bhulani, Nizar, Hoyt, David B., Ko, Clifford Y., Weissman, Joel S. +3 more·2019·Journal of the American College of Surgeons

Abstract

[Extract] Healthcare disparities in quality represent one of the greatest challenges in achieving uniformly high-quality care. Research reporting disparities in surgical outcomes are abundant. The cornerstone of delivering high-quality healthcare is ensuring optimal access for all patients. A relative lack of access to surgical services might be a contributing factor to disparities in surgical outcomes. Access is "the timely use of personal health services to achieve the best possible outcomes." Use of services, the process of entering and staying in the system, and the actual quality of care received are all involved. Disparities in access arise when the system disproportionately underperforms for a specific group of patients relative to the historically advantaged population.8, 9 Surgery, because of its time sensitive, often high-acuity nature, is greatly dependent on access.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2018.12.028

Cites

242 of 242 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In other studies, surgical disparities persist when controlling for social determinants and insurance variables, suggesting additional unknown mechanisms drive observed disparities.

    “In others, surgical disparities persist when controlling for these variables, suggesting that there are additional, unknown mechanisms driving observed disparities that warrant closer examination.”

    From Racial and ethnic disparities in interhospital transfer for complex emergency general surgical disease across the United States (2023) · cites this paper as [2]

    The Discussion says some studies adjust for confounding social determinants and describes multiple possible causes of surgical-access disparities. It does not say that disparities persisted after adjustment for social determinants and insurance, or identify such persistence as evidence of unknown mechanisms. No page number is available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Differential access to specialty care can drive surgical disparities.

    “Differential access to specialty care can drive surgical disparities.”
  • The selection of covariates was made a priori based on factors known to influence interhospital transfer.

    “The selection of covariates was made a priori based on factors known to influence IHT.”

    From Racial and ethnic disparities in interhospital transfer for complex emergency general surgical disease across the United States (2023) · cites this paper as [2]

    The Methods (Data extraction and analysis; page unavailable) describe extracting and categorizing measures of surgical-access disparities, not selecting covariates for an interhospital-transfer analysis. The Results (Provider Access; page unavailable) discuss access to surgical providers but do not identify factors known to influence interhospital transfer. Searches for “interhospital transfer,” “IHT,” and “a priori covariates” found no passage addressing the claim. (LLM, conf=0.75)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [7]In: Millman M, ed. Access to Health Care in America. Washington (DC); 1993. 25144064

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
de Jager, E., Levine, A. A., Udyavar, R. N., Burstin, H. R., Bhulani, N., Hoyt, D. B., Ko, C. Y., Weissman, J. S., Britt, L. D., Haider, A. H., & Maggard-Gibbons, M. A.
Affiliations
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
  • Council of Medical Specialty Societies (US)
  • American College of Surgeons (US)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • Eastern Virginia Medical School (US)
Corresponding author
Maggard-Gibbons, Melinda A.
Venue
Journal of the American College of Surgeons
Published
2019-03
Volume
228
Issue
3
Pages
276-298
ISSN
1072-7515 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2916916949
Cited by
178
References
242
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 5
FWCI
3.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American College of Surgeons (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • ResearchOnline at James Cook University (James Cook University) (submittedVersion)
  • eCommons - AKU (Aga Khan University) (submittedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (5RO1MD011695-02)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Healthcare Policy and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Global Health and Surgery
Keywords
surgical access, health care disparities, surgical outcomes, quality of care, underserved populations, conceptual model, evidence map
MeSH terms
Health Services Accessibility, Humans, Surgical Procedures, Operative, United States, Healthcare Disparities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review