Cited by 81Hospital Admissions and OutcomesGeriatric Care and Nursing HomesEmergency and Acute Care Studies

Challenges in transitional care between nursing homes and emergency departments

Terrell, Kevin M., Miller, Douglas K.·2006·Journal of the American Medical Directors Association

Abstract

Objective To obtain opinions of knowledgeable professionals involved in the emergency care of nursing home (NH) residents.Design Structured focus group interviews.Participants Five provider categories, including NH staff, NH physicians and nurse practitioners, emergency medical services (EMS) providers, emergency department (ED) nurses, and ED physicians.Setting Two NHs, 2 EDs, and a county-wide EMS system.Analysis Audiotaped discussions were transcribed and analyzed independently by 2 authors.Results Themes included barriers to providing high-quality care, data needed when residents are transported in both directions between EDs and NHs, and possible solutions to improve care. Communication problems were the most frequently cited barrier to providing care. Residents are often transported in both directions without any written documentation; however, even when communication does occur, it is often not in a mode that is useable by the receiving provider. ED personnel need a small amount of organized, written information. When residents are released from the ED, NH personnel need a verbal report from ED nurses as well as written documentation. All groups were optimistic that communication can be improved. Ideas included use of (1) fax machines or audiotape cassette recorders to exchange information, (2) an emergency form in residents' charts that contains predocumented information with an area to write in the reason for transfer, and (3) brief NH-to-ED and ED-to-NH transfer forms that are accepted and used by local NHs and EDs.Conclusion The transitional care of NH residents is laden with problems but has solutions that deserve additional development and investigation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jamda.2006.03.004

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Terrell, K. M., & Miller, D. K.
Affiliations
Regenstrief Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Terrell, Kevin M.
Venue
Journal of the American Medical Directors Association
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-10
Volume
7
Issue
8
Pages
499-505
ISSN
1525-8610 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1971294030
Cited by
81
References
27
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 4
FWCI
3.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the American Medical Directors Association (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Hospital Admissions and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Emergency and Acute Care Studies
Keywords
care transitions, nursing home residents, emergency department, interprofessional communication, barriers to care, emergency medical services, patient handover, long-term care
MeSH terms
Emergency Service, Hospital, Humans, Nursing Homes, Patient Transfer, United States, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Focus Groups, Interdisciplinary Communication

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review