Cited by 83Nutrition, Health and Food BehaviorFood Security and Health in Diverse PopulationsHealth Literacy and Information Accessibility

Comparison of a web-based vs in-person nutrition education program for low-income adults

Neuenschwander, Lauren M., Abbott, Angela, Mobley, Amy R.·2013·Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics

Abstract

As access to computers and the Internet by the low-income population is increasing and the "digital divide" is slowly diminishing, other methods of delivering nutrition information to this audience are evolving. This randomized, block equivalence trial sought to determine whether web-based nutrition education could result in equivalent nutrition-related behavior outcomes when compared with traditional in-person nutrition education in low-income adults. A convenience sample of low-income adults (n=123) was randomized to receive in-person education (n=66) or web-based education (n=57) in a community setting within 14 counties of Indiana from April through December 2010. The web-based group received three nutrition education lessons (eg, fruits and vegetables, Nutrition Facts label reading, and whole grains) designed to replicate lessons received by the in-person group. Lessons were developed using Kolb's Learning Styles and Experiential Learning Model. Self-reported nutrition-related behaviors were assessed using a previously validated survey for low-income adults. Most nutrition-related behavior outcomes (eg, fruit, vegetable, whole-grain intake, Nutrition Facts label use, breakfast, and meal-planning frequency) improved significantly (P<0.05) from pre to post within both groups, meaning that each intervention was effective. When these nutrition-related behavior improvements were compared between groups, the changes were statistically equivalent (P>0.05), except for one question about use of the Nutrition Facts label. Therefore, web-based nutrition education can lead to favorable and equivalent nutrition-related changes when compared with in-person delivery. Most (83%) web-based participants also reported willingness to use the website again. Future application of web-based interventions for low-income populations could broaden delivery reach, increase frequency and length of contacts, and possibly decrease costs.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jand.2012.07.034

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Neuenschwander, L. M., Abbott, A., & Mobley, A. R.
Affiliations
Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
Corresponding author
Mobley, Amy R.
Venue
Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-01
Volume
113
Issue
1
Pages
120-126
ISSN
2212-2672 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1969304272
Cited by
83
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 5
FWCI
4.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
Keywords
low-income adults, dietary behavior change, digital divide, fruit and vegetable intake, whole grain intake, meal planning, Kolb learning styles, experiential learning, community-based nutrition programs
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Female, Health Education, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Education as Topic, Poverty, Health Behavior, Internet, Nutritional Sciences, Consumer Health Information, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review