Cited by 109Acne and Rosacea Treatments and EffectsDermatology and Skin DiseasesNutrition, Health and Food Behavior

Relationships of self-reported dietary factors and perceived acne severity in a cohort of New York young adults

Burris, Jennifer, Rietkerk, William, Woolf, Kathleen·2014·Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics

Abstract

Background Recent observational and experimental evidence suggests that diet may contribute to acne prevalence. Objectives To examine the differences in select dietary factors (glycemic index [GI], total sugar, added sugar, fruit/fruit juice, fruit/vegetables, vegetables, saturated fat, trans fat, and number of milk and fish servings per day) between groups of self-reported acne severity. Secondary objectives were to investigate the differences in food-aggravated acne beliefs and acne-specific quality-of-life between groups of self-reported acne severity. Design This study utilized a cross-sectional design. Participants/setting A total of 248 (115 male, 133 female) participants, age 18 to 25 years, completed questionnaires designed to measure self-reported acne severity, select dietary factors, food-aggravated acne beliefs, acne-specific quality-of-life, and anthropometric and demographic characteristics. The Block fat/sugar/fruit/vegetable food frequency questionnaire assessed usual dietary intake. Data were collected in New York City between January and May 2012. Statistical analyses performed One-way between groups analysis of variance examined differences in dietary factors, anthropometric characteristics, and acne-specific quality-of-life between groups of self-reported acne. χ² tests compared food-aggravated acne beliefs and demographic characteristics between groups of self-reported acne. Results Compared with participants with no or mild acne, participants with modera…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jand.2013.11.010

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • 46.4% (13/28) of observational studies described the associations of dairy products and GI/glycemic load with acne.

    “and 46.4% (13/28) described the associations of dairy products and GI/glycemic load with acne (Table III).34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46”

    From Diet and acne: A systematic review (2022) · cites this paper as [35]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Burris, J., Rietkerk, W., & Woolf, K.
Affiliations
New York University (US)
Corresponding author
Burris, Jennifer
Venue
Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-03
Volume
114
Issue
3
Pages
384-392
ISSN
2212-2672 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2079662864
Cited by
109
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 8
FWCI
11.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Acne and Rosacea Treatments and Effects
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Dermatology and Skin Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
Keywords
acne, dietary factors, glycemic index, added sugars, saturated fat, trans fatty acids, milk consumption, fish consumption, young adults
MeSH terms
Acne Vulgaris, Adolescent, Adult, Animals, Cross-Sectional Studies, Diet, Dietary Fats, Female, Fishes, Fruit, Humans, Male, Milk, New York City, Perception, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Vegetables, Body Mass Index, Dietary Sucrose, Glycemic Index, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review