The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The OCI-R: Validation of the subscales in a clinical sample
Abstract
The psychometric properties of the Obsessive-Compulsive Inventory-Revised (OCI-R) subscales have not been validated in a clinical sample of individuals diagnosed with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Data were collected on 186 patients diagnosed with OCD and 17 patients diagnosed with generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) using the OCI-R and the Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS). Confirmatory factor analysis revealed an acceptable factor structure. Patients with a given primary symptom subtype were elevated on the corresponding subscale of the OCI-R compared to other OCD patients and patients with GAD. In addition, patients who acknowledged that symptom subtype as present but not primary on the Y-BOCS had elevated OCI-R scores on that scale compared to patients who did not endorse that symptom subtype and patients with GAD. Results indicate that the subscales of the OCI-R are valid measures of six symptom subtypes of OCD. The OCI-R is a psychometrically sound, brief instrument. The current data combined with previous efforts suggest that it is appropriate for clinical and non-clinical populations, and for clinical and research purposes. Further research should examine the sensitivity of the specific subscales to treatment effects, and the potential for adding more items to account for other symptom domains of OCD.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The OCI-R contains good psychometric properties [74, 76, 77] that have been confirmed for the German version [75, 78].”
From Metacognitive Training for Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: A study protocol for a randomized controlled trial (2020) · cites this paper as [77]
Citations
Cites
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999) · Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1080/10705519909540118 · Cited by 108,788
The Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale: I. Development, Use, and Reliability
Goodman, W. K. (1989) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1989.01810110048007 · Cited by 7,712
The Obsessive-Compulsive Inventory: Development and validation of a short version.
Foa, E. B., Huppert, J. D., Leiberg, S., Langner, R., Kichic, R., Hajcak, G., & Salkovskis, P. M. (2002) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/1040-3590.14.4.485 · Cited by 2,959
Self-citationThe Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale: measures of internal consistency.
Kim, S.-W., Dysken, M., Pheley, A., & Hoover, K. M. (1994) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/0165-1781(94)90039-6 · Cited by 2,333
A multidimensional model of obsessive-compulsive disorder
Mataix-Cols, D., do Rosario-Campos, M. C., & Leckman, J. F. (2005) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.162.2.228 · Cited by 1,074
Measurement of compulsive hoarding: saving inventory-revised
Frost, R. O., Steketee, G., & Grisham, J. (2004) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2003.07.006 · Cited by 803
The validation of a new obsessive–compulsive disorder scale: The Obsessive–Compulsive Inventory
Foa, E. B., Kozak, M. J., Salkovskis, P. M., Coles, M. E., & Amir, N. (1998) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/1040-3590.10.3.206 · Cited by 719 · cited 1×
“Previous analyses of the hoarding subscale (Foa et al., 1998, 2002) suggested that patients with OCD (undifferentiated by subtype) were no more elevated on this subscale than nonclinical participants.”
MethodSelf-citationBurns, G. L., Keortge, S. G., Formea, G. M., & Sternberger, L. G. (1996) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/0005-7967(95)00035-6 · Cited by 667
Foa, E. B., Kozak, M. J., Goodman, W. K., Hollander, E., Jenike, M. A., & Rasmussen, S. A. (1995) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/ajp.152.1.90 · Cited by 521
Self-citationThe Vancouver Obsessional Compulsive Inventory (VOCI)
Thordarson, D. S., Radomsky, A. S., Rachman, S., Shafran, R., Sawchuk, C. N., & Hakstian, A. R. (2003) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2003.08.007 · Cited by 495
Psychometric properties of the OCI-R in a college sample
Hajcak, G., Huppert, J. D., Simons, R. F., & Foa, E. B. (2004) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2003.08.002 · Cited by 392
Self-citationTwo different types of obsession: Autogenous obsessions and reactive obsessions
Lee, H.-J., & Kwon, S.-M. (2003) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/s0005-7967(01)00101-2 · Cited by 235
Relationship Between Obsessive Beliefs and Obsessive–Compulsive Symptoms
Tolin, D. F., Woods, C. M., & Abramowitz, J. S. (2003) · Cognitive Therapy and Research · doi:10.1023/a:1026351711837 · Cited by 201
Fullana, M. A., Tortella‐Feliu, M., Caseras, X., Andión, Ó., Torrúbia, R., & Mataix‐Cols, D. (2004) · Journal of Anxiety Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.janxdis.2004.10.004 · Cited by 166
Calamari, J. E., Wiegartz, P. S., Riemann, B. C., Cohen, R. J., Greer, A., Jacobi, D. M., Jahn, S. C., & Carmin, C. (2004) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/s0005-7967(03)00173-6 · Cited by 143
Watson, D., & Wu, K. D. (2005) · Assessment · doi:10.1177/1073191104271483 · Cited by 131
Measuring Change in OCD: Sensitivity of the Obsessive-Compulsive Inventory-Revised
Abramowitz, J. S., Tolin, D. F., & Diefenbach, G. J. (2005) · Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment · doi:10.1007/s10862-005-2411-y · Cited by 128
The distinctiveness of compulsive hoarding from obsessive–compulsive disorder
Grisham, J. R., Brown, T. A., Liverant, G. I., & Campbell‐Sills, L. (2004) · Journal of Anxiety Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.janxdis.2004.09.003 · Cited by 122
Are there reliable neuropsychological deficits in obsessive–compulsive disorder?
Simpson, H. B., Rosen, W. G., Huppert, J. D., Lin, S., Foa, E. B., & Liebowitz, M. R. (2005) · Journal of Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2005.04.004 · Cited by 100
Self-citationClark, D. A., Antony, M. M., Beck, A. T., Swinson, R. P., & Steer, R. A. (2005) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/1040-3590.17.2.132 · Cited by 69
Wu, K. D., & Watson, D. (2003) · Journal of Anxiety Disorders · doi:10.1016/s0887-6185(02)00234-7 · Cited by 50
Miller, M. C. (1995) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/ajp.152.4.aj1524654 · Cited by 12
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Foa, 1995, DSM-IV field trial: obsessive–compulsive disorder, American Journal of Psychiatry, 152, 654
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Huppert, J. D., Simpson, H. B., Nissenson, K. J., Liebowitz, M. R., & Foa, E. B. (2009) · Depression and Anxiety · doi:10.1002/da.20506 · Cited by 314
Self-citationDevelopment and Validation of a Child Version of the Obsessive Compulsive Inventory
Foa, E. B., Coles, M. E., Huppert, J. D., Pasupuleti, R. V., Franklin, M. E., & March, J. S. (2009) · Behavior Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.beth.2009.02.001 · Cited by 276
Self-citationDevelopment and psychometric evaluation of the Yale–Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale—Second Edition.
Storch, E. A., Rasmussen, S. A., Price, L. H., Larson, M. J., Murphy, T. K., & Goodman, W. K. (2010) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/a0018492 · Cited by 283
“R also shows good construct validity (Grabill et al., 2008; Huppert et al., 2007), correlating well with the Y-BOCS (r !”
MethodCourse of compulsive hoarding and its relationship to life events
Tolin, D. F., Meunier, S. A., Frost, R. O., & Steketee, G. (2010) · Depression and Anxiety · doi:10.1002/da.20684 · Cited by 250
“Participants scored in the clinical range for detecting hoarding on both the HRS-SR([24]) and OCI-R.([25]) Ninety-four percent of the sample scored 14 or greater on the HRS-SR; this cutoff reliably distinguishes those with clinically significant hoarding from those without hoarding.”
MethodResultInfluentialGönner, S., Leonhart, R., & Ecker, W. (2008) · Journal of Anxiety Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.janxdis.2007.07.007 · Cited by 235
Metadata
- Authors
- Huppert, J. D., Walther, M. R., Hajcak, G., Yadin, E., Foa, E. B., Simpson, H. B., & Liebowitz, M. R.
- Affiliations
- University of Pennsylvania (US)
- New York State Psychiatric Institute (US)
- Corresponding author
- Huppert, Jonathan D.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of Anxiety Disorders
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2007
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 394-406
- ISSN
- 0887-6185 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1976550676
- Cited by
- 325
- References
- 22
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 39
- FWCI
- 7.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Anxiety Disorders (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Yale University
- National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH045404, K23MH064491, R01MH045436)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Keywords
- Obsessive-Compulsive Inventory-Revised, obsessive-compulsive disorder, psychometric properties, generalized anxiety disorder, factor structure, Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale, clinical samples
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Severity of Illness Index, Reproducibility of Results, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
