Cited by 195Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchVirtual Reality Applications and ImpactsPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

Trauma management therapy with virtual-reality augmented exposure therapy for combat-related PTSD: A randomized controlled trial

Beidel, Deborah C., Frueh, B. Christopher, Neer, Sandra M., Bowers, Clint A., Trachik, Benjamin, Uhde, Thomas W., Grubaugh, Anouk·2019·Journal of Anxiety Disorders

Abstract

Virtual reality exposure therapy (VRET) realistically incorporates traumatic cues into exposure therapy and holds promise in the treatment of combat-related posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). In a randomized controlled trial of 92 Iraq and Afghanistan veterans and active duty military personnel with combat-related PTSD, we compared the efficacy of Trauma Management Therapy (TMT; VRET plus a group treatment for anger, depression, and social isolation) to VRET plus a psychoeducation control condition. Efficacy was evaluated at mid- and post-treatment, and at 3- and 6-month follow-up. Consistent with our hypothesis, VRET resulted in significant decreases on the Clinician Administered PTSD Scale and the PTSD Checklist-Military version for both groups. Also consistent with our hypothesis, significant decreases in social isolation occurred only for those participants who received the TMT group component. There were significant decreases for depression and anger for both groups, although these occurred after VRET and before group treatment. All treatment gains were maintained six-months later. Although not part of the original hypotheses, sleep was not improved by either intervention and remained problematic. The results support the use of VRET as an efficacious treatment for combat-related PTSD, but suggest that VRET alone does not result in optimal treatment outcomes across domains associated with PTSD.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.janxdis.2017.08.005

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Beidel, D. C., Frueh, B. C., Neer, S. M., Bowers, C. A., Trachik, B., Uhde, T. W., & Grubaugh, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Hawaii at Hilo (US)
  • University of Central Florida (US)
  • Medical University of South Carolina (US)
Venue
Journal of Anxiety Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-01
Volume
61
Pages
64-74
ISSN
0887-6185 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2748207128
Cited by
195
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 41 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 3
FWCI
24.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Anxiety Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
U.S. Army Medical Research & Materiel Command-Military Operational Medicine Research Program (W81XWH-11-2-0038)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
virtual reality exposure therapy, combat-related posttraumatic stress disorder, group therapy, anger, depression, social isolation, military veterans, Iraq and Afghanistan veterans, active duty military personnel, psychoeducation, sleep disorders, maintenance therapy
MeSH terms
Adult, Anger, Depression, Female, Humans, Male, Military Personnel, Psychotherapy, Sleep, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Veterans, Treatment Outcome, Virtual Reality Exposure Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review