CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 322Decision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsClinical Reasoning and Diagnostic SkillsHuman-Automation Interaction and Safety

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 49 of the 55 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A naturalistic decision making perspective on studying intuitive decision making.

Open access
Klein, Gary·2015·Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition
DOI 10.1016/j.jarmac.2015.07.001
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Abstract The Naturalistic Decision Making (NDM) community defines intuition as based on large numbers of patterns gained through experience, resulting in different forms of tacit knowledge. This view contrasts with Fast and Frugal Heuristics (FFH) researchers, who view intuition in terms of general purpose heuristics. The NDM view also differs from the Heuristics and Biases (HB) community, which sees intuitions as a source of bias and error. Seven suggestions are offered to assist the FFH and H&B communities in improving intuitive decision making and in conducting research that has greater potential for application. Rather than trying to help people analyze which option to choose, the NDM community recommends that intuitions be strengthened by providing a broader experience base that lets people build better tacit knowledge, such as perceptual skills and richer mental models, as a means of achieving better decisions.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jarmac.2015.07.001

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 55 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 301–321 of 321

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Klein, G.
Corresponding author
Klein, Gary
ORCID
Klein, Gary
Venue
Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition
Publisher
American Psychological Association (APA)
Published
2015-09
Volume
4
Issue
3
Pages
164-168
ISSN
  • 2211-3681 (ISSN-L)
  • 2211-369X
DOI
10.1016/j.jarmac.2015.07.001
OpenAlex
W1154580924
Cited by
322
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 29 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 45 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 56 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 1
FWCI
10.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition (publishedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
  • Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Keywords
naturalistic decision making, intuitive decision making, tacit knowledge, fast and frugal heuristics, heuristics and biases, intuition, experience base, perceptual skills, mental models, decision-making

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review