The DOI matches its Crossref record; 49 of the 55 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A naturalistic decision making perspective on studying intuitive decision making.
Open accessAbstract
Abstract The Naturalistic Decision Making (NDM) community defines intuition as based on large numbers of patterns gained through experience, resulting in different forms of tacit knowledge. This view contrasts with Fast and Frugal Heuristics (FFH) researchers, who view intuition in terms of general purpose heuristics. The NDM view also differs from the Heuristics and Biases (HB) community, which sees intuitions as a source of bias and error. Seven suggestions are offered to assist the FFH and H&B communities in improving intuitive decision making and in conducting research that has greater potential for application. Rather than trying to help people analyze which option to choose, the NDM community recommends that intuitions be strengthened by providing a broader experience base that lets people build better tacit knowledge, such as perceptual skills and richer mental models, as a means of achieving better decisions.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“First, research in Naturalistic Decision Making (NDM) demonstrates that 'system 1' thinking, which they call intuition, is a powerful source of problem solving that often produces better and/or faster decisions than system 2 [16].”
From Explainable AI is Dead, Long Live Explainable AI!: Hypothesis-driven Decision Support using Evaluative AI (2023) · cites this paper as [16]
Citations
Cites
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.185.4157.1124 · Cited by 28,810
Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1975) · Utility, Probability, and Human Decision Making · doi:10.1007/978-94-010-1834-0_8 · Cited by 22,650
The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation
Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195092691.001.0001 · Cited by 18,010
Gioia, D. A., Mehra, A., & Weick, K. E. (1996) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/259169 · Cited by 15,616
The Knowledge-Creating Company
Nonaka, I. (1998) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-7506-7009-8.50016-1 · Cited by 14,668
Polanyi, M. (1997) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-7506-9718-7.50010-x · Cited by 12,410
Toward a Theory of Situation Awareness in Dynamic Systems
Endsley, M. R. (1995) · Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1518/001872095779049543 · Cited by 8,875
Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy
Reid, L. A., & Polanyi, M. (1959) · British Journal of Educational Studies · doi:10.2307/3119338 · Cited by 7,880
Simple Heuristics That Make Us Smart
Gigerenzer, G., & Todd, P. M. (1999) · Cited by 3,563
The Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance
Ericsson, K. A., Charness, N. H., Feltovich, P. J., Hoffman, R. R., Michelene, T. H., Hunt, E., Prietula, M. J., Amirault, R. J., Branson, R. K., Buchanan, B. G., et al. (2006) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511816796 · Cited by 3,160
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Jussupow, E., Spohrer, K., Heinzl, A., & Gawlitza, J. (2021) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.2020.0980 · Cited by 422
Miller, T. (2023) · 2023 ACM Conference on Fairness Accountability and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3593013.3594001 · Cited by 172
Accuracy of Practitioner Estimates of Probability of Diagnosis Before and After Testing
Morgan, D. J., Pineles, L. L., Owczarzak, J., Magder, L. S., Scherer, L. D., Brown, J., Pfeiffer, C., Terndrup, C., Leykum, L. K., Feldstein, D., et al. (2021) · JAMA Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.0269 · Cited by 142
Applied decision making with fast-and-frugal heuristics.
Hafenbrädl, S., Waeger, D., Marewski, J. N., & Gigerenzer, G. (2016) · Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.jarmac.2016.04.011 · Cited by 140
Board engagement with digital technologies: A resource dependence framework
Oliveira, F., KAKABADSE, N. K., & Khan, N. (2021) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.10.010 · Cited by 90
Metadata
- Authors
- Klein, G.
- Corresponding author
- Klein, Gary
- ORCID
- Klein, Gary
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition
- Published
- 2015-09
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 164-168
- ISSN
- 2211-3681 (ISSN-L)
- 2211-369X
- OpenAlex
- W1154580924
- Cited by
- 322
- References
- 55
- Citations by year
- 2026: 29 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 45 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 56 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 10.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
- Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
- Keywords
- naturalistic decision making, intuitive decision making, tacit knowledge, fast and frugal heuristics, heuristics and biases, intuition, experience base, perceptual skills, mental models, decision-making
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
