Cited by 185Archaeological Research and ProtectionUrban Design and Spatial AnalysisHistorical and Architectural Studies

Assessing the level of visibility of cultural objects in past landscapes

Ogburn, Dennis E.·2006·Journal of Archaeological Science

Abstract

Visibility is often understood to play a significant role in the placement of cultural objects within past landscapes. In recent years, GIS-based visibility studies have become popular as a method for assessing the role of views to and from sites and features. A significant drawback to these analyses is that they do not take into account how far an object can be clearly seen and recognized. A number of factors influence the visibility of objects, including the limits of human visual acuity, environmental effects such as atmospheric extinction, and the physical properties of object and surroundings. Current approaches that attempt to account for these influences focus on defining visual zones, but are limited because they do not directly address object size. A fuzzy viewshed approach, modified to account for target size, is suggested as a solution for assessing the level of visibility of cultural objects in past landscapes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jas.2005.08.005

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Krist, 1995, GIS modelling of paleo-Indian period Caribou Migrations and viewsheds in Northeastern Lower Michigan, Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 60, 1129

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ogburn, D. E.
Affiliations
University of California, Berkeley (US)
Corresponding author
Ogburn, Dennis E.
Venue
Journal of Archaeological Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-03
Volume
33
Issue
3
Pages
405-413
ISSN
0305-4403 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2085221126
Cited by
185
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 8
FWCI
5.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Archaeological Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Space and Planetary Science › Archaeological Research and Protection
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Urban Design and Spatial Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Historical and Architectural Studies
Keywords
visibility, cultural artifacts, past landscapes, target size, visual acuity, atmospheric extinction, site location

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review