CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 38

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Mapping the possible occurrence of archaeological sites by Bayesian inference

Finke, P.A., Meylemans, E., Van de Wauw, J.·2008·Journal of Archaeological Science
DOI 10.1016/j.jas.2008.05.004
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jas.2008.05.004

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 36

  1. Arts, 1988, A survey of final Paleolithic archaeology in the southern Netherlands, vol. 444(I), 287
  2. Aspinall, 1992, An inductive modelling procedure based on Bayes' theorem for analysis of pattern in spatial data, International Journal of Geographical Information Systems, 6, 105, 10.1080/02693799208901899 · DOI
  3. Bateman, 1999, The timing of last-glacial periglacial and aeolian events, Twente, eastern Netherlands, Journal of Quaternary Science, 14, 227, 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1417(199905)14:3<277::AID-JQS460>3.0.CO;2-W · DOI
  4. Cauwe, 2001, The Middle and Late Neolithic, Anthropologica et Praehistorica, 112, 77
  5. Couvreur, 2004, Ecodistricten en ecoregio's: gereedschappen voor Vlaams milieubeleid, Natuur.focus, 3, 51
  6. Crombé, 2001, The Mesolithic, Anthropologica et Praehistorica, 112, 49
  7. Deeben, 2002, Predictive modelling in archaeological heritage management of the Netherlands: the indicative map of archaeological values (2nd generation), Berichten van de Rijksdienst voor het Oudheidkundig Bodemonderzoek, 45, 9
  8. Espa, 2006, GIS based models and estimation methods for the probability of archaeological site location, Journal of Cultural Heritage, 7, 147, 10.1016/j.culher.2006.06.001 · DOI
  9. Gerlach, 2003, Wie dynamisch sind die geogenen Grundlagen einer archäologischen Prognose? Die Veränderungen von Relief, Boden und Wasser seit dem Neolithikum, vol. 8
  10. Gorsevski, 2003, Integrating a fuzzy k-means classification and a Bayesian approach for spatial prediction of landslide hazard, Journal of Geographical Systems, 5, 223, 10.1007/s10109-003-0113-0 · DOI
  11. Goodman, 1999, Toward evidence-based medical statistics. 2: the Bayes factor, Annals of Internal Medicine, 130, 1005, 10.7326/0003-4819-130-12-199906150-00019 · DOI
  12. Hanley, 1983, A method of comparing the areas under receiving operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases, Radiology, 148, 839, 10.1148/radiology.148.3.6878708 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Hengl, 2004, A double continuous approach to visualisation and analysis of categorical maps, International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 18, 183, 10.1080/13658810310001620924 · DOI
  14. Kamermans, H., Deeben, J., Hallewas, D., Van Leusen, M., Verhagen, Ph., Zoetbrood, P., 2004. Deconstructing the crystal ball: the state of the art in predictive modelling for archaeological heritage management in the Netherlands. In: Stadtarchäologie Wien, Enter the Past. The E-way into the Four Dimensions of Cultural Heritage. BAR International Series, vol. 1227, p. 175.
  15. Koomen, 2004, Het stuifzandlandschap als natuurverschijnsel, Landschap, 21, 159
  16. Kvamme, 1983, Computer processing techniques for regional modelling of archaeological locations, Advances in Computer Archaeology, 1, 26
  17. Kvamme, 1990, The fundamental principles and practice of predictive archaeological modeling, vol. 3, 257
  18. McBratney, 1985, Application of fuzzy-sets to climatic classification, Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 35, 165, 10.1016/0168-1923(85)90082-6 · DOI
  19. Meylemans, E., 2004. Drie jaar Centrale Archeologische Inventaris: overzicht en stand van zaken (in Dutch). In: CAI-I. De opbouw van een archeologisch beleidsinstrument. IAP rapporten 14, Brussel, pp. 9–28. Available from: http://oar.vioe.be/item/1 (with English summary).
  20. Moore, 1993, Soil attribute prediction using terrain analysis, Soil Science Society of America Journal, 57, 443, 10.2136/sssaj1993.03615995005700020026x · DOI
  21. Mullenders, 1961, Recherches palynologiques dans la vallée de la Grande Nèthe à Geel (Campine Belge), Bulletin de la Société Royale Botanique de Belgique, 23, 131
  22. Munaut, 1973, Evolution et paléo-écologie de la vallée de la Petite Nèthe au cours du Post-Würm (Belgique), Annales de la Societe Geologique de Belgique, 96, 301
  23. Nicholls, 2001, Application of fuzzy cluster analysis to Lake Simcoe crustacean zooplankton community structure, Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 58, 231, 10.1139/f00-231 · DOI
  24. Odeh, 1992, Soil pattern-recognition with fuzzy-c-means – application to classification and soil-landform interrelationships, Soil Science Society of America Journal, 56, 505, 10.2136/sssaj1992.03615995005600020027x · DOI
  25. Pebesma, 2004, Multivariable geostatistics in S: the gstat package, Computers and Geosciences, 30, 683, 10.1016/j.cageo.2004.03.012 · DOI
  26. Peterson, 1954, The theory of signal detectibility, Transactions of the IRE Professional Group in Information Theory, PGIT, 2–4, 171
  27. Simpson, 1973, What is the best index of detectability?, Psychological Bulletin, 80, 481, 10.1037/h0035203 · DOI
  28. Spiegelhalter, 1994, Bayesian approaches to randomized trials, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, 157, 357, 10.2307/2983527 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Van Berg, 2001, The early Neolithic, Anthropologica et Praehistorica, 112, 63
  30. Van Dalen, 1999, Probability modelling: a Bayesian and a geometric example, vol. 3
  31. Van Gils, M., De Bie, M., 2006. Steentijd in de Kempen. Prospectie, kartering en waardering van het (laat)Paleolithisch en Mesolithisch erfgoed (in Dutch). In: Cousserier K., Meylemans, E. Centrale Archeologische Inventaris II (CAI-II): Thematisch inventarisatie- en evaluatieonderzoek. VIOE rapporten 2, Brussel, pp. 2–11. Available from: www.vioe.be/nl/uploads/b25.pdf (with english summary).
  32. Vanacker, 1999, Ruimtelijke modellering van de relatie tussen tussen fysische landschapskenmerken en het Mesolithisch nederzettingspatroon in de Antwerpse Noorderkempen, De Aardrijkskunde, 3, 33
  33. Van Leusen, M., Deeben, J., Hallewas, D., Zoetbrood, P., Kamermans, H., Verhagen, Ph., 2005. A baseline for predictive modelling in the Netherlands. In: Van Leusen M., Kamermans, H., Predictive Modelling for Archaeological Heritage Management: a Research Agenda. Nederlandse Archeologische Rapporten 29, pp. 25–92.
  34. Verhaert, A., Annaert, R., Langohr, R., Cooremans, B., Gelorini, V., Bastiaens, J., Deforce, K., Ervynck, A., Desender, K., 2004. Een inheems-Romeinse begraafplaats te Klein-Ravels (gem. Ravels, prov. Antwerpen) (in Dutch). In: Archeologie in Vlaanderen VIII, pp. 165–218. Available from: http://oar.vioe.be/item/39 (with English summary). · DOI
  35. Vitharana, 2008, Key soil and topographic properties to delineate potential management classes for precision agriculture in the European loess area, Geoderma, 143, 206, 10.1016/j.geoderma.2007.11.003 · DOI
  36. Zevenbergen, 1987, Quantitative analysis of land surface topography, Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 12, 47, 10.1002/esp.3290120107 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Finke, P. A., Meylemans, E., & Van de Wauw, J.
Venue
Journal of Archaeological Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-10
Volume
35
Issue
10
Pages
2786-2796
ISSN
0305-4403
DOI
10.1016/j.jas.2008.05.004
Cited by
38
References
1
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review