Cited by 51Archaeology and ancient environmental studiesIsotope Analysis in EcologyForensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies

Stable carbon and nitrogen isotopes of human dental calculus: a potentially new non-destructive proxy for paleodietary analysis

Scott, G. Richard, Poulson, Simon R.·2012·Journal of Archaeological Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jas.2011.09.029

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Scott, G. R., & Poulson, S. R.
Affiliations
University of Nevada, Reno (US)
Corresponding author
Scott, G. Richard
Venue
Journal of Archaeological Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-05
Volume
39
Issue
5
Pages
1388-1393
ISSN
0305-4403 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2132839757
Cited by
51
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Archaeological Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Isotope Analysis in Ecology
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies
Keywords
dental calculus, stable carbon isotopes, stable nitrogen isotopes, paleodietary analysis, Inuit diet, seafood consumption, bioarchaeology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review