Range of bone modifications by human chewing
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The crushing of extremities at Navatu midden can potentially be interpreted as human chewing.
“This type of crushing of extremities can potentially be interpreted as human chewing (personal observation from DeGusta, 1999, Figs. 6 and 8) compared to similar modifications produced on experimental samples (Saladié et al., 2013) and observed at the Upper Palaeolithic site of Gough's Cave (Bello et al., 2015;Férnandez-Jalvo & Andrews, 2011).”
From The Archaeology of Cannibalism: a Review of the Taphonomic Traits Associated with Survival and Ritualistic Cannibalism (2025) · cites this paper as Saladié et al., 2013
Three metacarpals, one metatarsal, and three phalanges displayed cut marks, likely from disarticulation and defleshing of the hands and feet.
“Three metacarpals, one metatarsal, and three phalanges also displayed cut marks, likely from the disarticulation and defleshing of the hands and feet, based on their location and experimental evidence31.”
From Evidence of neolithic cannibalism among farming communities at El Mirador cave, Sierra de Atapuerca, Spain (2025) · cites this paper as [31]
Human tooth marks were identified considering their location on the bones, morphology, and combination of modifications.
“Human tooth marks were identified considering their location on the bones, morphology, and combination of modifications31.”
From Evidence of neolithic cannibalism among farming communities at El Mirador cave, Sierra de Atapuerca, Spain (2025) · cites this paper as [31]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 52 · Cited by 103
- Authors
- Saladié, P., Rodríguez-Hidalgo, A., Díez, C., Martín-Rodríguez, P., & Carbonell, E.
- Affiliations
- Institut Català de Paleoecologia Humana i Evolució Social (ES)
- Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Saladié, Palmira
- Venue
- Journal of Archaeological Science
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-01
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 380-397
- ISSN
- 0305-4403 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1999545263
- Cited by
- 103
- References
- 52
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 20.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Archaeological Science (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación, (The Ministry of Science and Innovation)
- CGL2009-12703-C03-02/BTE
- Generalitat de Catalunya (Catalan Central Government)
- SGR 2009-188
- 2010 PBR 00010
- Consejería de Cultura y Turismo of the Junta de Castilla y León (The Cultural and Tourism Council of Castilla and Leon)
- Fundación Atapuerca (The Atapuerca Foundation)
- Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (Ministry of Economy and Competitively of Spanish Government)
- CGL2009-12703-C03-02
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
- Keywords
- tooth marks, bone modification, experimental archaeology, zooarchaeology, Sierra de Atapuerca, Pleistocene, Holocene, ethnoarchaeology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
