The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A house with a view? Multi-model inference, visibility fields, and point process analysis of a Bronze Age settlement on Leskernick Hill (Cornwall, UK)
Abstract
This paper combines point-process modelling, visibility analysis and an information criteria approach to infer the reasons behind the Bronze Age settlement pattern of Leskernick Hill in Cornwall, UK. We formalise three alternative hypotheses as point process models characterised by different combinations of covariates. In addition to using traditional topographic variables, we use a form of affordance viewsheds, which we refer to as visibility fields, to investigate the visual properties of different parts of the landscape, both cultural and natural. We compare these three models by means of information criteria, and generate a fourth hybrid model by recombining variables drawn from each. The results reveal that a mixture of covariates drawn from the three hypotheses combined with a spatial interaction model provides the best overall model for the settlement pattern. We show that the settlement on Leskernick Hill was most likely the result of two separate decision-making processes, one to optimise the visibility of ritual monuments and important natural landmarks, and the other to optimise the visibility of nearby tin-extraction areas. We conclude that by using an information criterion approach it is possible to easily compare the models and identify which among these is the most satisfying in the present state of our knowledge.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Further, by focusing upon factors such as distance and direction questions of movement and mobility can begin to be addressed; indeed the AGL mapping would make a very interesting input into the generation of view-paths (e.g.Lock et al. 2014) and visibility fields (Eve and Crema 2014) not to mention cost-surfaces more generally (Wheatley and Gillings 2002, 151-159).”
From Mapping invisibility: GIS approaches to the analysis of hiding and seclusion (2015) · cites this paper as Eve and Crema 2014
Citations
Cites
Visibility Studies in Archaeology: A Review and Case Study
Lake, M. W., & Woodman, P. E. (2003) · Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design · doi:10.1068/b29122 · Cited by 110
VISUAL AFFORDANCE, LANDSCAPE, AND THE MEGALITHS OF ALDERNEY
GILLINGS, M. (2009) · Oxford Journal of Archaeology · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0092.2009.00332.x · Cited by 79
Intensities, interactions and uncertainties: some new approaches to archaeological distributions
(2016) · Computational Approaches to Archaeological Spaces · doi:10.4324/9781315431932-8 · Cited by 64
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 22
- Baddeley, 1995, Area-interaction point processes, Ann. Inst. Stat. Math., 47, 601, 10.1007/BF01856536 · DOI
- Baddeley, 2000, Practical maximum pseudolikelihood for spatial point patterns, Aust. N. Z. J. Stat., 42, 283, 10.1111/1467-842X.00128 · DOI
- Baddeley, 2005, Spatstat: an R package for analyzing spatial point patterns, J. Stat. Softw., 12, 1, 10.18637/jss.v012.i06 · DOI
- Baddeley, 2012, Score, pseudo-score and residual diagnostics for spatial point process models, Stat. Sci., 26, 613, 10.1214/11-STS367 · DOI
- Barrett, 2009, Book review of memory and material culture and stone worlds, Am. J. Archaeol., 113, 481, 10.3764/aja.113.3.481 · DOI
- Beheim, 2011, Inheritance, ecology and the evolution of the canoes of east Oceania, Proc. R. Soc. B, 278, 3089, 10.1098/rspb.2011.0060 · DOI
- Bevan, 2013, Models of settlement hierarchy based on partial evidence, J. Archaeol. Sci., 40, 2415, 10.1016/j.jas.2012.12.025 · DOI · Paper page
- Brown, 1977, Late Devensian and Flandrian vegetational history of Bodmin Moor, Cornwall, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B, 276, 251, 10.1098/rstb.1977.0001 · DOI
- Caseldine, 1980, Environmental change in Cornwall during the last 13,000 years, Corn. Archaeol., 19, 3
- Chapman, 2000, Palaeoecology and the perception of prehistoric landscapes: some comments on visual approaches to phenomenology, Antiquity, 74, 316, 10.1017/S0003598X00059366 · DOI
- Crema, 2010, A probabilistic framework for assessing spatio-temporal point patterns in the archaeological record, J. Archaeol. Sci., 37, 1118, 10.1016/j.jas.2009.12.012 · DOI
- Darvill, 2009, A review of stone worlds: narrative and reflexivity in landscape archaeology, Camb. Archaeol. J., 19, 263, 10.1017/S0959774309000341 · DOI
- Frieman, 2007, Seeing is perceiving?, World Archaeol., 39, 4, 10.1080/00438240601133816 · DOI
- Herring, 1997, Early prehistoric sites at Leskernick, Altarnun, Corn. Archaeol., 36, 176
- Herring, 2008, Bodmin Moor: Industrial and Post-medieval Landscapes, vol. 2
- Hicks, 2009, A review of stone worlds: narrative and reflexivity in landscape archaeology, Am. Antiq., 74, 590, 10.1017/S0002731600048940 · DOI
- Markovsky, 2014, When survey goes east: field survey methodologies and analytical frameworks in a Central Asian context, J. Archaeol. Method Theory, 10.1007/s10816-013-9172-9 · DOI
- Orton, 2004, Point pattern analysis revisited, Archeol. Calcolatori, 15, 299
- Schwarz, 1978, Estimating the dimension of a model, Ann. Stat., 6, 461, 10.1214/aos/1176344136 · DOI · Paper page
- Tilley, 1996, The Powers of rocks: topography and monument construction on Bodmin Moor, World Archaeol., 28, 161, 10.1080/00438243.1996.9980338 · DOI
- Vanzetti, 2010, The iceman as a burial, Antiquity, 84, 684, 10.1017/S0003598X0010016X · DOI
- Walker, 1985, Redhill Marsh, a site of possible Mesolithic activity on Bodmin Moor, Cornwall, Corn. Archaeol., 24, 15
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Mapping invisibility: GIS approaches to the analysis of hiding and seclusion
Gillings, M. (2015) · Journal of Archaeological Science · doi:10.1016/j.jas.2015.06.015 · Cited by 71
Mapping liminality: Critical frameworks for the GIS-based modelling of visibility
Gillings, M. (2017) · Journal of Archaeological Science · doi:10.1016/j.jas.2017.05.004 · Cited by 38
Bilotti, G., Reindel, M., Isla, J., & Mader, C. (2025) · Journal of Archaeological Science · doi:10.1016/j.jas.2025.106385 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Eve, S. J., & Crema, E. R.
- Venue
- Journal of Archaeological Science
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-03
- Volume
- 43
- Pages
- 267-277
- ISSN
- 0305-4403
- Cited by
- 55
- References
- 3
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review