Cited by 55

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A house with a view? Multi-model inference, visibility fields, and point process analysis of a Bronze Age settlement on Leskernick Hill (Cornwall, UK)

Eve, Stuart J., Crema, Enrico R.·2014·Journal of Archaeological Science

Abstract

This paper combines point-process modelling, visibility analysis and an information criteria approach to infer the reasons behind the Bronze Age settlement pattern of Leskernick Hill in Cornwall, UK. We formalise three alternative hypotheses as point process models characterised by different combinations of covariates. In addition to using traditional topographic variables, we use a form of affordance viewsheds, which we refer to as visibility fields, to investigate the visual properties of different parts of the landscape, both cultural and natural. We compare these three models by means of information criteria, and generate a fourth hybrid model by recombining variables drawn from each. The results reveal that a mixture of covariates drawn from the three hypotheses combined with a spatial interaction model provides the best overall model for the settlement pattern. We show that the settlement on Leskernick Hill was most likely the result of two separate decision-making processes, one to optimise the visibility of ritual monuments and important natural landmarks, and the other to optimise the visibility of nearby tin-extraction areas. We conclude that by using an information criterion approach it is possible to easily compare the models and identify which among these is the most satisfying in the present state of our knowledge.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jas.2013.12.019

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 22

  1. Baddeley, 1995, Area-interaction point processes, Ann. Inst. Stat. Math., 47, 601, 10.1007/BF01856536 · DOI
  2. Baddeley, 2000, Practical maximum pseudolikelihood for spatial point patterns, Aust. N. Z. J. Stat., 42, 283, 10.1111/1467-842X.00128 · DOI
  3. Baddeley, 2005, Spatstat: an R package for analyzing spatial point patterns, J. Stat. Softw., 12, 1, 10.18637/jss.v012.i06 · DOI
  4. Baddeley, 2012, Score, pseudo-score and residual diagnostics for spatial point process models, Stat. Sci., 26, 613, 10.1214/11-STS367 · DOI
  5. Barrett, 2009, Book review of memory and material culture and stone worlds, Am. J. Archaeol., 113, 481, 10.3764/aja.113.3.481 · DOI
  6. Beheim, 2011, Inheritance, ecology and the evolution of the canoes of east Oceania, Proc. R. Soc. B, 278, 3089, 10.1098/rspb.2011.0060 · DOI
  7. Bevan, 2013, Models of settlement hierarchy based on partial evidence, J. Archaeol. Sci., 40, 2415, 10.1016/j.jas.2012.12.025 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Brown, 1977, Late Devensian and Flandrian vegetational history of Bodmin Moor, Cornwall, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B, 276, 251, 10.1098/rstb.1977.0001 · DOI
  9. Caseldine, 1980, Environmental change in Cornwall during the last 13,000 years, Corn. Archaeol., 19, 3
  10. Chapman, 2000, Palaeoecology and the perception of prehistoric landscapes: some comments on visual approaches to phenomenology, Antiquity, 74, 316, 10.1017/S0003598X00059366 · DOI
  11. Crema, 2010, A probabilistic framework for assessing spatio-temporal point patterns in the archaeological record, J. Archaeol. Sci., 37, 1118, 10.1016/j.jas.2009.12.012 · DOI
  12. Darvill, 2009, A review of stone worlds: narrative and reflexivity in landscape archaeology, Camb. Archaeol. J., 19, 263, 10.1017/S0959774309000341 · DOI
  13. Frieman, 2007, Seeing is perceiving?, World Archaeol., 39, 4, 10.1080/00438240601133816 · DOI
  14. Herring, 1997, Early prehistoric sites at Leskernick, Altarnun, Corn. Archaeol., 36, 176
  15. Herring, 2008, Bodmin Moor: Industrial and Post-medieval Landscapes, vol. 2
  16. Hicks, 2009, A review of stone worlds: narrative and reflexivity in landscape archaeology, Am. Antiq., 74, 590, 10.1017/S0002731600048940 · DOI
  17. Markovsky, 2014, When survey goes east: field survey methodologies and analytical frameworks in a Central Asian context, J. Archaeol. Method Theory, 10.1007/s10816-013-9172-9 · DOI
  18. Orton, 2004, Point pattern analysis revisited, Archeol. Calcolatori, 15, 299
  19. Schwarz, 1978, Estimating the dimension of a model, Ann. Stat., 6, 461, 10.1214/aos/1176344136 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Tilley, 1996, The Powers of rocks: topography and monument construction on Bodmin Moor, World Archaeol., 28, 161, 10.1080/00438243.1996.9980338 · DOI
  21. Vanzetti, 2010, The iceman as a burial, Antiquity, 84, 684, 10.1017/S0003598X0010016X · DOI
  22. Walker, 1985, Redhill Marsh, a site of possible Mesolithic activity on Bodmin Moor, Cornwall, Corn. Archaeol., 24, 15

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 55

Metadata

Authors
Eve, S. J., & Crema, E. R.
Venue
Journal of Archaeological Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-03
Volume
43
Pages
267-277
ISSN
0305-4403
Cited by
55
References
3
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review