Cited by 9Archaeological Research and ProtectionHistorical and Cultural Archaeology StudiesUrban Design and Spatial Analysis

Expanding omnidirectional geospatial modeling for archaeology: A case study of dispersal in a “New England” colonial frontier (ca. 1600–1750)

Kelly, Dylan R., Clark, Melissa M., Palace, Michael, Howey, Meghan C.L.·2023·Journal of Archaeological Science

Abstract

Geospatial landscape connectivity modeling techniques are widely used in archaeological studies of past human movement patterns and landscape interactions. Recent advancements in the development of omnidirectional modeling approaches present new avenues for research design and require introduction into the field. In this paper, we present a novel adaptation of a point-based omnidirectional model design that we use to advance understandings of early colonial expansion (ca. 1600–1750 CE) into a social and ecological frontier landscape in the Northeastern United States, the Great Bay Estuary. We build case-specific resistance surfaces and use Circuitscape modeling to simulate the outward dispersal of settler colonists from the landscape's central water bodies while accounting for the influences of both water-based and overland travel, as well as the availability of specific natural resources. The outcome of the simulation performs well when tested statistically against the archaeological record and the value of multivariate model parameterization is highlighted both quantitatively and qualitatively. This case study offers a framework others could use to advance their own contextually-informed modeling of past human dispersal and landscape interactions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jas.2022.105710

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Candee, 1970, Merchant and millwright: the water powered sawmills of the Piscataqua, Old Time N. Engl., 60, 131
  2. Howey, 2017, Assessing the state of archaeological GIS research: unbinding analyses of past landscapes. Journal of archaeological science, archaeological GIS today: persistent challenges, pushing old boundaries, and Exploring New Horizons, 84, 1
  3. Kohut, 2018, A multidirectional model for studying mobility affordance of past landscapes. Journal of Archaeological Science:, Report, 19, 239
  4. Veracini, 2010, vol. 10
  5. Wernke, 2017, A GIS of affordances: movement and visibility at a planned colonial town in highland Peru. Journal of archaeological science, archaeological GIS today: persistent challenges,, Pushing Old Boundaries, and Exploring New Horizons, 84, 22

Cited by

Still being checked.

Authors
Kelly, D. R., Clark, M. M., Palace, M., & Howey, M. C. L.
Affiliations
  • University of New Hampshire (US)
  • The Nature Conservancy (US)
Corresponding author
Kelly, Dylan R.
Venue
Journal of Archaeological Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-02
Volume
150
Pages
105710
ISSN
0305-4403 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4313623230
Cited by
9
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4
FWCI
5.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Archaeological Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Space and Planetary Science › Archaeological Research and Protection
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Historical and Cultural Archaeology Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Urban Design and Spatial Analysis
Keywords
Circuitscape, human dispersal, colonial frontier, Great Bay Estuary, resistance surfaces, natural resource availability, landscape interaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review