CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 5

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Typological and technological attributes of metallurgical crucibles from Great Zimbabwe (1000–1700 CE)'s legacy collections

Bandama, Foreman, Moffett, Abigail Joy, Chirikure, Shadreck·2017·Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports
DOI 10.1016/j.jasrep.2017.02.029
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jasrep.2017.02.029

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Great Zimbabwe imported metals and alloys from other areas, including tin from Rooiberg 500 km away and brass from the Indian Ocean rim.

    “Great Zimbabwe also imported metals and alloys from other areas, such as tin from Rooiberg, 500 km away in northern South Africa (Grant 1999;Molofsky et al. 2014), and brass from the Indian Ocean rim (Bandama et al. 2017).”

    From New Perspectives on the Political Economy of Great Zimbabwe (2020) · cites this paper as Bandama et al. 2017

  • No one area of Great Zimbabwe itself and the wider state produced commodities such as metal for others, effectively ruling out any clearly defined product specialization and division of labor.

    “That each household was associated with evidence of craft production suggests that no one area of Great Zimbabwe itself and the wider state produced commodities such as metal for others, effectively ruling out any clearly defined product specialization and division of labor (Bandama et al. 2017;Chirikure 2007;Huffman 1972).”

    From New Perspectives on the Political Economy of Great Zimbabwe (2020) · cites this paper as Bandama et al. 2017

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 26

  1. Bandama, 2015, Eiland crucibles and the earliest relative dating for tin and bronze working in Southern Africa, J. Archaeol. Sci., 62, 82, 10.1016/j.jas.2015.07.007 · DOI
  2. Bandama, 2016, The production, distribution and consumption of metals and alloys at Great Zimbabwe, Archaeometry, 10.1111/arcm.12248 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Chirikure, 2007, Metals and society: iron production and its position in Iron Age communities of southern Africa, J. Soc. Archaeol., 7, 74, 10.1177/1469605307073164 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Chirikure, 2013, A Bayesian chronology for Great Zimbabwe: re-threading the sequence of a vandalised monument, Antiquity, 87, 854, 10.1017/S0003598X00049516 · DOI
  5. Chirikure, 2015, When ceramic sociology meets material science: sociological and technological aspects of crucibles and pottery from Mapungubwe, southern Africa, J. Anthropol. Archaeol., 40, 23, 10.1016/j.jaa.2015.05.004 · DOI
  6. Chirikure, 2016, Seen but not told: re-mapping Great Zimbabwe using archival data, satellite imagery and geographical information systems, J. Archaeol. Method Theory, 23, 1
  7. Grant, 1999, The sourcing of southern African tin artifacts, J. Archaeol. Sci., 26, 1111, 10.1006/jasc.1999.0406 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Gwavava, 2009, The geology and structure of the Masvingo greenstone belt and adjacent granite plutons from geophysical data, Zimbabwe craton, S. Afr. J. Geol., 112, 277, 10.2113/gssajg.112.3-4.277 · DOI
  9. Hein, 2013, Heat transfer properties of pyrotechnical ceramics used in ancient metallurgy, Thermochim. Acta, 573, 87, 10.1016/j.tca.2013.09.024 · DOI
  10. König, 2013, Roman double-layered crucibles from Autun/France: a petrological and geochemical approach, J. Archaeol. Sci., 40, 156, 10.1016/j.jas.2012.07.011 · DOI
  11. Maggs, 1995, Sandstone crucibles from Mhlopeni, Natal: evidence of precolonial brass-working, Natal Mus. J. Humanit., 7, 1
  12. Martinón-Torres, 2008, Mass-Produced Mullite Crucibles in Medieval Europe: Manufacture and Material Properties, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 91, 2071, 10.1111/j.1551-2916.2008.02383.x · DOI
  13. Merriman, 1999, Archaeological archives: serving the public interest?, Eur. J. Archaeol., 2, 249, 10.1179/eja.1999.2.2.249 · DOI
  14. Miller, 2001, Metal assemblages from Greefswald areas K2, Mapungubwe hill and Mapungubwe southern terrace, S. Afr. Archaeol. Bull., 83–103
  15. Miller, 2002, Smelter and smith: Iron Age metal fabrication technology in southern Africa, J. Archaeol. Sci., 29, 1083, 10.1006/jasc.2001.0758 · DOI
  16. Miller, 2010, Indigenous metal melting and casting in southern Africa, S. Afr. Archaeol. Bull., 65, 45
  17. Miller, 2008, Rooiberg revisited: the analysis of tin and copper smelting debris, Hist. Metall., 42, 23
  18. Miller, 2000, Indigenous gold mining in southern Africa: a review, Goodwin Ser., 91, 10.2307/3858050 · DOI
  19. Molofsky, 2014, A novel approach to lead isotope provenance studies of tin and bronze: applications to South African, Botswanan and Romanian artifacts, J. Archaeol. Sci., 50, 440, 10.1016/j.jas.2014.08.006 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Nixon, 2011, New light on the early Islamic West African gold trade: coin moulds from Tadmekka, Mali, Antiquity, 85, 1353, 10.1017/S0003598X00062104 · DOI
  21. Rademakers, 2016, Seeing the forest for the trees: assessing technological variability in ancient metallurgical crucible assemblages, J. Archaeol. Sci. Rep., 7, 588
  22. Sinclair, 2012, Trade and society on the south-east African coast in the later first millennium AD: the case of Chibuene, Antiquity, 86, 723, 10.1017/S0003598X00047876 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Stanley, 1929, The composition of some pre-historic South African bronzes with notes on the methods of analysis, S. Afr. J. Sci., 26, 44
  24. Stanley, 1929, Primitive metallurgy in South Africa: some products and their significance, S. Afr. J. Sci., 26, 732
  25. Summers, 1961, Zimbabwe excavations, 1958, 3, 226
  26. Thondhlana, 2009, Small size, high value: Composition and manufacture of second millennium AD copper-based beads from northern Zimbabwe, J. Afr. Archaeol., 7, 79, 10.3213/1612-1651-10119 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Bandama, F., Moffett, A. J., & Chirikure, S.
Venue
Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-04
Volume
12
Pages
646-657
ISSN
2352-409X
DOI
10.1016/j.jasrep.2017.02.029
Cited by
5
References
0
Language
en
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review