Cited by 7Protein Tyrosine PhosphatasesProtein Structure and DynamicsEnzyme Structure and Function

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Determinants of receptor tyrosine phosphatase homophilic adhesion: Structural comparison of PTPRK and PTPRM extracellular domains

Open access

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Type IIB receptor protein tyrosine phosphatases are cell surface transmembrane proteins that engage in cell adhesion via their extracellular domains (ECDs) and cell signaling via their cytoplasmic phosphatase domains. The ECDs of type IIB receptor protein tyrosine phosphatases form stable, homophilic, and trans interactions between adjacent cell membranes. Previous work has demonstrated how one family member, PTPRM, forms head-to-tail homodimers. However, as the interface was composed of residues conserved across the family, the determinants of homophilic specificity remain unknown. Here, we have solved the X-ray crystal structure of the membrane-distal N-terminal domains of PTPRK that form a head-to-tail dimer consistent with intermembrane adhesion. Comparison with the PTPRM structure demonstrates interdomain conformational differences that may define homophilic specificity. Using small-angle X-ray scattering, we determined the solution structures of the full-length ECDs of PTPRM and PTPRK, identifying that both are rigid extended molecules that differ in their overall long-range conformation. Furthermore, we identified one residue, W351, within the interaction interface that differs between PTPRM and PTPRK and showed that mutation to glycine, the equivalent residue in PTPRM, abolishes PTPRK dimer formation in vitro. This comparison of two members of the receptor tyrosine phosphatase family suggests that homophilic specificity is driven by a combination of shape complementarity and specific but limited sequence differences.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jbc.2022.102750

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 48

  1. Garcia, 2018, Cell-cell junctions organize structural and signaling networks, Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol., 10, a029181, 10.1101/cshperspect.a029181 · DOI
  2. McLachlan, 2007, Not so simple: the complexity of phosphotyrosine signaling at cadherin adhesive contacts, J. Mol. Med., 85, 545, 10.1007/s00109-007-0198-x · DOI
  3. Chiasson-MacKenzie, 2018, Cell-cell contact and receptor tyrosine kinase signaling, Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol., 10, a029215, 10.1101/cshperspect.a029215 · DOI
  4. Young, 2021, Protein tyrosine phosphatases in cell adhesion, Biochem. J., 478, 1061, 10.1042/BCJ20200511 · DOI
  5. Fearnley, 2019, The homophilic receptor PTPRK selectively dephosphorylates multiple junctional regulators to promote cell–cell adhesion, eLife, 8, 10.7554/eLife.44597 · DOI
  6. Zondag, 2000, Receptor protein-tyrosine phosphatase RPTPμ binds to and dephosphorylates the catenin p120 ctn, J. Biol. Chem., 275, 11264, 10.1074/jbc.275.15.11264 · DOI
  7. Anders, 2006, Furin-, ADAM 10-, and gamma-secretase-mediated cleavage of a receptor tyrosine phosphatase and regulation of beta-catenin's transcriptional activity, Mol. Cell Biol., 26, 3917, 10.1128/MCB.26.10.3917-3934.2006 · DOI
  8. Tonks, 2006, Protein tyrosine phosphatases: from genes, to function, to disease, Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol., 7, 833, 10.1038/nrm2039 · DOI
  9. Becka, 2010, Characterization of the adhesive properties of the type IIb subfamily receptor protein tyrosine phosphatases, Cell Commun. Adhes., 17, 34, 10.3109/15419061.2010.487957 · DOI
  10. Gebbink, 1993, Cell-cell adhesion mediated by a receptor-like protein tyrosine phosphatase, J. Biol. Chem., 268, 16101, 10.1016/S0021-9258(19)85392-9 · DOI
  11. Gebbink, 1995, Cell surface expression of receptor protein tyrosine phosphatase RPTP mu is regulated by cell-cell contact, J. Cell Biol., 131, 251, 10.1083/jcb.131.1.251 · DOI
  12. Brady-Kalnay, 1993, Homophilic binding of PTP mu, a receptor-type protein tyrosine phosphatase, can mediate cell-cell aggregation, J. Cell Biol., 122, 961, 10.1083/jcb.122.4.961 · DOI
  13. Aricescu, 2007, Structure of a tyrosine phosphatase adhesive interaction reveals a spacer-clamp mechanism, Science, 317, 1217, 10.1126/science.1144646 · DOI
  14. Aricescu, 2006, Molecular analysis of receptor protein tyrosine phosphatase μ-mediated cell adhesion, EMBO J., 25, 701, 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600974 · DOI
  15. Zondag, 1995, Homophilic interactions mediated by receptor tyrosine phosphatases μ and κ. A critial role for the novel extracellular MAM domain, J. Biol. Chem., 270, 14247, 10.1074/jbc.270.24.14247 · DOI
  16. Lutteke, 2009, Analysis and validation of carbohydrate three-dimensional structures, Acta Crystallogr. D, 65, 156, 10.1107/S0907444909001905 · DOI
  17. Lawrence, 1993, Shape complementarity at protein/protein interfaces, J. Mol. Biol., 234, 946, 10.1006/jmbi.1993.1648 · DOI
  18. Receveur-Brechot, 2012, How random are intrinsically disordered proteins? A small angle scattering perspective, Curr. Protein Pept. Sci., 13, 55, 10.2174/138920312799277901 · DOI
  19. Svergun, 1999, Restoring low resolution structure of biological macromolecules from solution scattering using simulated annealing, Biophys. J., 76, 2879, 10.1016/S0006-3495(99)77443-6 · DOI
  20. Blanchet, 2015, Versatile sample environments and automation for biological solution X-ray scattering experiments at the P12 beamline (PETRA III, DESY), J. Appl. Cryst., 48, 431, 10.1107/S160057671500254X · DOI
  21. Petoukhov, 2012, New developments in the ATSAS program package for small-angle scattering data analysis, J. Appl. Cryst., 45, 342, 10.1107/S0021889812007662 · DOI
  22. consortium, 2022, PDBe-KB: collaboratively defining the biological context of structural data, Nucl. Acids Res., 50, D534, 10.1093/nar/gkab988 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Emsley, 2010, Features and development of coot, Acta Crystallogr. D, 66, 486, 10.1107/S0907444910007493 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Nagae, 2012, Function and 3D structure of the N-glycans on glycoproteins, Int. J. Mol. Sci., 13, 8398, 10.3390/ijms13078398 · DOI
  25. Gecht, 2021, GlycoSHIELD: a versatile pipeline to assess glycan impact on protein structures, BioRxiv
  26. Bager, 2013, Protein conformational change delayed by steric hindrance from an N-linked glycan, J. Mol. Biol., 425, 2867, 10.1016/j.jmb.2013.05.007 · DOI
  27. Wilkins, 1999, Protein identification and analysis tools in the ExPASy server, Met. Mol. Biol., 112, 531
  28. Walter, 2008, Semi-automated microseeding of nanolitre crystallization experiments, Acta Crystallogr. F, 64, 14, 10.1107/S1744309107057260 · DOI
  29. Winter, 2018, DIALS: implementation and evaluation of a new integration package, Acta Crystallogr. D, 74, 85, 10.1107/S2059798317017235 · DOI
  30. Evans, 2013, How good are my data and what is the resolution?, Acta Crystallogr. D, 69, 1204, 10.1107/S0907444913000061 · DOI
  31. McCoy, 2007, Solving structures of protein complexes by molecular replacement with Phaser, Acta Crystallogr. D, 63, 32, 10.1107/S0907444906045975 · DOI
  32. Bunkoczi, 2011, Improvement of molecular-replacement models with Sculptor, Acta Crystallogr. D, 67, 303, 10.1107/S0907444910051218 · DOI
  33. Griffith, 2021, PARROT is a flexible recurrent neural network framework for analysis of large protein datasets, eLife, 10, e70576, 10.7554/eLife.70576 · DOI
  34. Cowtan, 2006, The Buccaneer software for automated model building. 1. Tracing protein chains, Acta Crystallogr. D, 62, 1002, 10.1107/S0907444906022116 · DOI
  35. Croll, 2018, Isolde: a physically realistic environment for model building into low-resolution electron-density maps, Acta Crystallogr. D, 74, 519, 10.1107/S2059798318002425 · DOI
  36. Afonine, 2012, Towards automated crystallographic structure refinement with phenix.refine, Acta Crystallogr. D, 68, 352, 10.1107/S0907444912001308 · DOI · Paper page
  37. Pettersen, 2021, UCSF ChimeraX: structure visualization for researchers, educators, and developers, Protein Sci., 30, 70, 10.1002/pro.3943 · DOI
  38. Gräwert, 2020, Adding size exclusion chromatography (SEC) and light scattering (LS) Devices to Obtain high-quality small angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) data, Crystals, 10, 975, 10.3390/cryst10110975 · DOI
  39. Panjkovich, 2018, CHROMIXS: automatic and interactive analysis of chromatography-coupled small-angle X-ray scattering data, Bioinformatics, 34, 1944, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx846 · DOI
  40. Manalastas-Cantos, 2021, ATSAS 3.0: expanded functionality and new tools for small-angle scattering data analysis, J. Appl. Cryst., 54, 343, 10.1107/S1600576720013412 · DOI
  41. Franke, 2018, Machine learning methods for X-ray scattering data analysis from biomacromolecular solutions, Biophys. J., 114, 2485, 10.1016/j.bpj.2018.04.018 · DOI
  42. Svergun, 1992, Determination of the regularization parameter in indirect-transform methods using perceptual criteria, J. Appl. Cryst., 25, 495, 10.1107/S0021889892001663 · DOI
  43. Hajizadeh, 2018, Consensus bayesian assessment of protein molecular mass from solution X-ray scattering data, Sci. Rep., 8, 7204, 10.1038/s41598-018-25355-2 · DOI
  44. Semenyuk, 1991, GNOM– a program package for small-angle scattering data processing, J. Appl. Cryst., 24, 537, 10.1107/S002188989100081X · DOI
  45. Volkov, 2003, Uniqueness of ab-initio shape determination in small-angle scattering, J. Appl. Cryst., 36, 860, 10.1107/S0021889803000268 · DOI
  46. Svergun, 1995, Crysol – a program to evaluate X-ray solution scattering of biological macromolecules from atomic coordinates, J. Appl. Cryst., 28, 768, 10.1107/S0021889895007047 · DOI
  47. Kikhney, 2020, Sasbdb: towards an automatically curated and validated repository for biological scattering data, Protein Sci., 29, 66, 10.1002/pro.3731 · DOI
  48. Gupta, 2002, Prediction of glycosylation across the human proteome and the correlation to protein function, Pac. Symp. Biocomput., 310

Metadata

Authors
Hay, I. M., Shamin, M., Caroe, E. R., Mohammed, A. S. A., Svergun, D. I., Jeffries, C. M., Graham, S. C., Sharpe, H. J., & Deane, J. E.
Affiliations
  • Babraham Institute (GB)
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • European Molecular Biology Laboratory (DE)
Corresponding author
  • Sharpe, Hayley J.
  • Deane, Janet E.
Venue
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-01
Volume
299
Issue
1
Pages
102750
ISSN
0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4309938757
Cited by
7
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2
FWCI
0.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Biological Chemistry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Horizon 2020 Framework Programme
  • Seventh Framework Programme (283570, 871037)
  • Royal Society (109407/Z/15/Z, 203984, 219447/Z/19/Z, RGF∖EA∖180151, UF100371)
  • European Molecular Biology Organization
  • European Commission
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SV 9/11-1)
  • Wellcome Trust
  • Nvidia
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Tyrosine Phosphatases
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Structural Biology › Enzyme Structure and Function
Keywords
receptor tyrosine phosphatase, PTPRK, PTPRM, homophilic adhesion, extracellular domain structure, head-to-tail dimer, shape complementarity, crystal structure, small-angle X-ray scattering
MeSH terms
Cell Adhesion, Cell Line, Humans, Tyrosine, Signal Transduction, Protein Tyrosine Phosphatases, Receptor-Like Protein Tyrosine Phosphatases, Class 2

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review