Lineage-specific amino acids define functional attributes of the protomer-protomer interfaces for the Rad51 and Dmc1 recombinases
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
ABSTRACT Most eukaryotes possess two Rad51/RecA family DNA recombinases that are thought to have arisen from an ancient gene duplication event: Rad51, which is expressed in both mitosis and meiosis; and Dmc1, which is only expressed in meiosis. To explore the evolutionary relationship between these recombinases, here, we present high-resolution CryoEM structures of S. cerevisiae Rad51 filaments and S. cerevisiae Dmc1 filaments bound to ssDNA, which reveal a pair of stacked interfacial aromatic amino acid residues that are nearly universally conserved in Rad51 but are absent from Dmc1. We use a combination of bioinformatics, genetic analysis of natural sequence variation, and deep mutational analysis to probe the functionally tolerated sequence space for these stacked aromatic residues. Our findings demonstrate that the functional landscape of the interfacial aromatic residues within the Rad51 filament is highly constrained. In contrast, the amino acids at the equivalent positions within the Dmc1 filament exhibit a broad functional landscape. This work helps highlight the distinct evolutionary trajectories of these two eukaryotic recombinases, which may have contributed to their functional and mechanistic divergence. AUTHOR SUMMARY Most eukaryotic organisms have two closely related proteins, Rad51 and Dmc1, that are needed for different aspects of genetic recombination. These proteins may have evolved from a single gene that was duplicated during the early evolution of eukaryotes. Rad51 is active during both normal cell division (mitosis) and sexual reproduction (meiosis), while Dmc1 is only active during meiosis. To better understand how these proteins are related, we studied their three-dimensional structures using high resolution cryogenic electron microscopy. Our findings show that Rad51 has a specific set of conserved amino acids located at the protein interfaces, but this set of amino acids is different in Dmc1. We used a series of genetic approaches to analyze how these amino acids affect the proteins’ function. Our results show that Rad51 has a strict set of rules governing the identify of these amino acids, whereas Dmc1 does not. This research sheds light on how Rad51 and Dmc1 have evolved differently, leading to distinct functions in genetic recombination.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764 · see citing works
The importance of repairing stalled replication forks
Cox, M. M., Goodman, M. F., Kreuzer, K. N., Sherratt, D. J., Sandler, S. J., & Marians, K. J. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35003501 · Cited by 1,044 · see citing works
An evolutionary view of human recombination
Coop, G., & Przeworski, M. (2007) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg1947 · Cited by 344 · see citing works
Crystal structure of a Rad51 filament
Conway, A. B., Lynch, T. W., Zhang, Y., Fortin, G. S., Fung, C. W., Symington, L. S., & Rice, P. A. (2004) · Nature Structural & Molecular Biology · doi:10.1038/nsmb795 · Cited by 310 · see citing works
Recombination rate evolution and the origin of species
Ortiz-Barrientos, D., Engelstädter, J., & Rieseberg, L. H. (2016) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2015.12.016 · Cited by 202 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Petassi, M., Shin, Y., Jessop, A. M., Morse, K., Kim, S. Y., Kuppa, S., Matei, R., Raina, V. B., & Greene, E. C.
- Affiliations
- Columbia University Irving Medical Center (US)
- Corresponding author
- Greene, Eric C.
- Venue
- Journal of Biological Chemistry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2026-01
- Volume
- 302
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 111019
- ISSN
- 0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC12803942
- OpenAlex
- W4417137711
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2
- FWCI
- 0.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Biological Chemistry (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R35GM118026)
- National Institutes of Health National Cancer Institute (8217, 5K00CA274696)
- Simons Foundation (SF349247)
- Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research (75N91019D00024, U24GM129539)
- Columbia University (P30CA013696)
- National Institutes of Health
- National Science Foundation Directorate for Biological Sciences (MCB-1817315)
- National Science Foundation
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Enzyme Structure and Function
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Keywords
- RAD51, DMC1, single-stranded DNA binding, meiosis, gene duplication, evolutionary divergence, Saccharomyces cerevisiae
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review