Biomedical named entity recognition using BERT in the machine reading comprehension framework
Open accessAbstract
Recognition of biomedical entities from literature is a challenging research focus, which is the foundation for extracting a large amount of biomedical knowledge existing in unstructured texts into structured formats. Using the sequence labeling framework to implement biomedical named entity recognition (BioNER) is currently a conventional method. This method, however, often cannot take full advantage of the semantic information in the dataset, and the performance is not always satisfactory. In this work, instead of treating the BioNER task as a sequence labeling problem, we formulate it as a machine reading comprehension (MRC) problem. This formulation can introduce more prior knowledge utilizing well-designed queries, and no longer need decoding processes such as conditional random fields (CRF). We conduct experiments on six BioNER datasets, and the experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of our method. Our method achieves state-of-the-art (SOTA) performance on the BC4CHEMD, BC5CDR-Chem, BC5CDR-Disease, NCBI-Disease, BC2GM and JNLPBA datasets, achieving F1-scores of 92.92%, 94.19%, 87.83%, 90.04%, 85.48% and 78.93%, respectively.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Conventional NLP approaches for temporal information extraction suffer from limited scalability and generalizability and struggle to interpret implicit or vague temporal expressions.
“Conventional natural language processing (NLP) approaches suffer from limited scalability and generalizability, and struggle to interpret implicit or vague temporal expressions.”
From TimeX: Phenotype Onset Extraction from Clinical Narratives (2026) · cites this paper as [24]
The Introduction says traditional biomedical named-entity recognition relies on handcrafted, domain-specific features that are model- and entity-specific, which supports a limited-generalizability concern in that setting. It does not address scalability or the interpretation of implicit or vague temporal expressions in temporal information extraction; searches for those terms found no supporting passage. (LLM, conf=0.78)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding
Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/n19-1423 · Cited by 48,293 · see citing works
Deep Contextualized Word Representations
Peters, M., Neumann, M., Iyyer, M., Gardner, M., Clark, C., Lee, K., & Zettlemoyer, L. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/n18-1202 · Cited by 11,983 · see citing works
Zero-Shot Relation Extraction via Reading Comprehension
Levy, O., Seo, M., Choi, E., & Zettlemoyer, L. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1706.04115 · Cited by 482
Zero-Shot Relation Extraction via Reading Comprehension
Levy, O., Seo, M., Choi, E., & Zettlemoyer, L. (2017) · Proceedings of the 21st Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning (CoNLL 2017) · doi:10.18653/v1/k17-1034 · Cited by 482 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Inspired by the current trend of formalizing NLP tasks into machine reading comprehension (MRC) tasks [19]–[23], we use BioBERT in the MRC framework to perform BioNER (referred to BioBERT-MRC).”
Method
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 16
- G. Lample, M. Ballesteros, S. Subramanian, K. Kawakami, C. Dyer, Neural Architectures for Named Entity Recognition, in: Proceedings of the 2016 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 2016, pp. 260-270.
- A. Jagannatha, H. Yu, Structured prediction models for RNN based sequence labeling in clinical text, in: Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, 2016, pp. 856-865.
- D.S. Sachan, P. Xie, M. Sachan, E.P. Xing, Effective Use of Bidirectional Language Modeling for Transfer Learning in Biomedical Named Entity Recognition, Proc. Mach. Learn. Res. (2018) 383-402.
- J.D. Lafferty, A. McCallum, F.C.N. Pereira, Conditional Random Fields: Probabilistic Models for Segmenting and Labeling Sequence Data, in: Proceedings of the Eighteenth International Conference on Machine Learning, 2001, pp. 282-289.
- M. Kaneko, M. Komachi, Multi-Head Multi-Layer Attention to Deep Language Representations for Grammatical Error Detection, in: 20th International Conference on Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Text Processing, 2019.
- B. Mccann, N.S. Keskar, C. Xiong, R. Socher, The Natural Language Decathlon: Multitask Learning as Question Answering, arXiv: Computation and Language, 2018.
- X. Li, F. Yin, Z. Sun, X. Li, A. Yuan, D. Chai, M. Zhou, J. Li, Entity-Relation Extraction as Multi-Turn Question Answering, in: Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 2019, pp. 1340-1350.
- Y. Shen, P.-S. Huang, J. Gao, W. Chen, ReasoNet: Learning to Stop Reading in Machine Comprehension, in: Proceedings of the 23rd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 2017, pp. 1047-1055.
- X. Li, J. Feng, Y. Meng, Q. Han, F. Wu, J. Li, A Unified MRC Framework for Named Entity Recognition, in: Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 2020, pp. 5849-5859.
- J.-D. Kim, T. Ohta, Y. Tsuruoka, Y. Tateisi, N. Collier, Introduction to the Bio-Entity Recognition Task at JNLPBA, in: Proceedings of the International Joint Workshop on Natural Language Processing in Biomedicine and Its Applications, 2004, pp. 70-75.
- T. Mikolov, I. Sutskever, K. Chen, G.S. Corrado, J. Dean, Distributed representations of words and phrases and their compositionality, in: Advances in neural information processing systems, 2013, pp. 3111-3119.
- T. Mikolov, K. Chen, G. Corrado, J. Dean, Efficient estimation of word representations in vector space, in: International Conference on Learning Representations, 2013.
- J. Pennington, R. Socher, C. Manning, Glove: Global vectors for word representation, in: Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, 2014, pp. 1532-1543.
- A. Vaswani, N. Shazeer, N. Parmar, J. Uszkoreit, L. Jones, A.N. Gomez, Ł. Kaiser, I. Polosukhin, Attention is all you need, in: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2017, pp. 5998-6008.
- Y. Peng, S. Yan, Z. Lu, Transfer Learning in Biomedical Natural Language Processing: An Evaluation of BERT and ELMo on Ten Benchmarking Datasets, in: Proceedings of the 18th BioNLP Workshop and Shared Task, 2019, pp. 58-65.
- E. Alsentzer, J. Murphy, W. Boag, W.H. Weng, D. Jindi, T. Naumann, M. McDermott, Publicly Available Clinical BERT Embeddings, in: Proceedings of the 2nd Clinical Natural Language Processing Workshop, 2019, pp. 72-78.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Deep learning approach to detection of colonoscopic information from unstructured reports
Seong, D., Choi, Y. H., Shin, S.-Y., & Yi, B.-K. (2023) · BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making · doi:10.1186/s12911-023-02121-7 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
TimeX: Phenotype Onset Extraction from Clinical Narratives
Chen, F., Jiang, S., Nguyen, Q. M., Ta, C. N., Wang, K., Chung, W. K., & Weng, C. (2026) · npj Health Systems · doi:10.1038/s44401-026-00099-8
- Authors
- Sun, C., Yang, Z., Wang, L., Zhang, Y., Lin, H., & Wang, J.
- Affiliations
- Dalian University of Technology (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Yang, Zhihao
- Wang, Lei
- Venue
- Journal of Biomedical Informatics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-06
- Volume
- 118
- Pages
- 103799
- ISSN
- 1532-0464 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3157876196
- Cited by
- 131
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 7
- FWCI
- 7.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
- www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license (tdm)
- www.elsevier.com/open-access/userlicense/1.0/ (vor, 365 d)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-017 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-037 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-012 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-029 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-004 (stm-asf)
- Locations
- Journal of Biomedical Informatics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Key Research and Development Program of China (2016YFC0901902)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
- Keywords
- biomedical named entity recognition, machine reading comprehension, BERT, query design, prior knowledge, knowledge extraction
- MeSH terms
- Cognition, Semantics, Comprehension, Data Mining
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review