Cited by 16Machine Learning in HealthcareBiomedical Text Mining and OntologiesTopic Modeling

Deep learning approach to detection of colonoscopic information from unstructured reports

Open access
Seong, Donghyeong, Choi, Yoon Ho, Shin, Soo-Yong, Yi, Byoung-Kee·2023·BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer is a leading cause of cancer deaths. Several screening tests, such as colonoscopy, can be used to find polyps or colorectal cancer. Colonoscopy reports are often written in unstructured narrative text. The information embedded in the reports can be used for various purposes, including colorectal cancer risk prediction, follow-up recommendation, and quality measurement. However, the availability and accessibility of unstructured text data are still insufficient despite the large amounts of accumulated data. We aimed to develop and apply deep learning-based natural language processing (NLP) methods to detect colonoscopic information. METHODS: This study applied several deep learning-based NLP models to colonoscopy reports. Approximately 280,668 colonoscopy reports were extracted from the clinical data warehouse of Samsung Medical Center. For 5,000 reports, procedural information and colonoscopic findings were manually annotated with 17 labels. We compared the long short-term memory (LSTM) and BioBERT model to select the one with the best performance for colonoscopy reports, which was the bidirectional LSTM with conditional random fields. Then, we applied pre-trained word embedding using large unlabeled data (280,668 reports) to the selected model. RESULTS: The NLP model with pre-trained word embedding performed better for most labels than the model with one-hot encoding. The F1 scores for colonoscopic findings were: 0.9564 for lesions, 0.9722 for locations, 0.9809 for shapes, 0.9720 for colors, 0.9862 for sizes, and 0.9717 for numbers. CONCLUSIONS: This study applied deep learning-based clinical NLP models to extract meaningful information from colonoscopy reports. The method in this study achieved promising results that demonstrate it can be applied to various practical purposes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12911-023-02121-7

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Our review highlighted the generalized performance of LLM-enabled data extraction across various text types in oncology, including histological and pathological classification, imaging report classification, and data extraction from postoperative surgery reports.

    “For instance, our review highlighted the generalized performance of LLM-enabled data extraction across various text types in oncology, including histological and pathological classification [936], imaging report classification [814], and data extraction from postoperative surgery reports [5].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [59]Mikolov T, Sutskever I, Chen K, Corrado GS, Dean J. Distributed representations of words and phrases and their compositionality. In: NIPS Proceedings. 2013:3111–3119.
  2. [66]Kingma DP, Ba J. Adam: a method for stochastic optimization. 2014. arXiv preprint arXiv:14126980.
  3. [67]Dozat T. Incorporating nesterov momentum into adam. In: ICLR; 2016.
  4. [68]Tieleman T, Hinton G. Lecture 6.5-rmsprop: Divide the gradient by a running average of its recent magnitude. COURSERA: Neural networks for machine learning. 2012;4(2):26–31.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Seong, D., Choi, Y. H., Shin, S.-Y., & Yi, B.-K.
Affiliations
  • Sungkyunkwan University (KR)
  • Samsung Medical Center (KR)
  • Kangwon National University (KR)
Corresponding author
Yi, Byoung-Kee
Venue
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
Published
2023-02-07
Volume
23
Issue
1
Pages
28-28
ISSN
1472-6947 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4319437616
Cited by
16
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1
FWCI
1.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Ministry of Health and Welfare (HI19C1328)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
Keywords
clinical text, natural language processing, bidirectional LSTM, conditional random fields, BioBERT, pre-trained word embeddings, colorectal cancer screening, colorectal polyps, clinical information extraction
MeSH terms
Data Warehousing, Deep Learning, Colonoscopy, Humans, Natural Language Processing, Colorectal Neoplasms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review