Cited by 124Elasticity and Material ModelingAutomotive and Human Injury BiomechanicsTraumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances

Significance of source and size in the mechanical response of human cerebral blood vessels

Monson, Kenneth L., Goldsmith, Werner, Barbaro, Nicholas M., Manley, Geoffrey T.·2005·Journal of Biomechanics

Abstract

Cerebral blood vessels are frequently damaged in traumatic brain injury. Mechanical properties of fresh human cerebral vessels obtained through surgeries have been reported. Because surgical sources of human specimens are rare and produce a limited amount of material, we sought to compare the properties of more readily available cerebral arteries and veins obtained from cadavers to fresh vessel data. Additionally, because the previous study was limited to small vessels available in surgery, it was unknown how generally applicable the results were to larger cerebral arteries and veins. In the current study, large and small cerebral vessels from autopsy were stretched axially. Data from these and similar tests on fresh vessels were combined to determine the significance of source and size on mechanical properties. Structural comparisons of histological samples were additionally utilized to characterize differences. Results indicate that specimens from autopsy and surgery behave similarly except that vessels from autopsy tend to be less extensible. While tests on large vessels were limited, small arteries obtained from autopsy tended to be slightly stiffer than large arteries. In contrast, bridging veins from cadavers were typically stiffer and stretched less before structural failure than cortical veins from the same source. These effects are, however, secondary to differences identified between arteries and veins in the previous study.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.05.004

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Monson, K. L., Goldsmith, W., Barbaro, N. M., & Manley, G. T.
Affiliations
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
Corresponding author
Monson, Kenneth L.
Venue
Journal of Biomechanics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-04
Volume
38
Issue
4
Pages
737-744
ISSN
0021-9290 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2044988747
Cited by
124
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 12
FWCI
2.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Biomechanics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (R49 CCR919722-01)
  • University of California, San Francisco
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Elasticity and Material Modeling
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Automotive and Human Injury Biomechanics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
Keywords
cerebral vasculature, mechanical properties, traumatic brain injury, vessel size, axial stretching, extensibility, stiffness, arteries, veins, cortical veins, bridging veins, histological structure, structural failure
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Autopsy, Biomechanical Phenomena, Cadaver, Cerebral Arteries, Cerebral Veins, Elasticity, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, In Vitro Techniques

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review