CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 156Bone health and osteoporosis researchHigh-Velocity Impact and Material BehaviorBone fractures and treatments

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Microcracking damage and the fracture process in relation to strain rate in human cortical bone tensile failure

Open access
Zioupos, Peter, Hansen, Ulrich, Currey, John D.·2008·Journal of Biomechanics
DOI 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.07.025
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

It is difficult to define the 'physiological' mechanical properties of bone. Traumatic failures in-vivo are more likely to be orders of magnitude faster than the quasistatic tests usually employed in-vitro. We have reported recently [Hansen, U., Zioupos, P., Simpson, R., Currey, J.D., Hynd, D., 2008. The effect of strain rate on the mechanical properties of human cortical bone. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering/Transactions of the ASME 130, 011011-1-8] results from tests on specimens of human femoral cortical bone loaded in tension at strain rates (epsilon ) ranging from low (0.08s(-1)) to high (18s(-1)). Across this strain rate range the modulus of elasticity generally increased, stress at yield and failure and strain at failure decreased for rates higher than 1s(-1), while strain at yield was invariant for most strain rates and only decreased at rates higher than 10s(-1). The results showed that strain rate has a stronger effect on post-yield deformation than on initiation of macroscopic yielding. In general, specimens loaded at high strain rates were brittle, while those loaded at low strain rates were much tougher. Here, a post-test examination of the microcracking damage reveals that microcracking was inversely related to the strain rate. Specimens loaded at low strain rates showed considerable post-yield strain and also much more microcracking. Partial correlation and regression analysis suggested that the development of post-yield strain was a function of the amount of microcracking incurred (the cause), rather than being a direct result of the strain rate (the excitation). Presumably low strain rates allow time for microcracking to develop, which increases the compliance of the specimen, making them tougher. This behaviour confirms a more general rule that the degree to which bone is brittle or tough depends on the amount of microcracking damage it is able to sustain. More importantly, the key to bone toughness is its ability to avoid a ductile-to-brittle transition for as long as possible during the deformation. The key to bone's brittleness, on the other hand, is the strain and damage localisation early on in the process, which leads to low post-yield strains and low-energy absorption to failure.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.07.025

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Hynd, D., Willis, C., Roberts, A., Lowne, R., Hopcroft, R., Manning, P., Wallace, W.A., 2003. The development of an injury criterion for axial loading to the THOR-LX based on PMHS testing. In: Proceedings of the 18th International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles (ESV) Paper 078. Nagoya, Japan.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 156

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Zioupos, P., Hansen, U., & Currey, J. D.
Affiliations
  • Cranfield University (GB)
  • Imperial College London (GB)
  • University of York (GB)
Corresponding author
Zioupos, Peter
ORCID
Zioupos, Peter
Venue
Journal of Biomechanics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-10
Volume
41
Issue
14
Pages
2932-2939
ISSN
0021-9290 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.07.025
OpenAlex
W2054199016
Cited by
156
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 11
FWCI
9.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Journal of Biomechanics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Repository@Hull (Worktribe) (University of Hull) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Cranfield University
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Bone health and osteoporosis research
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanics of Materials › High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Bone fractures and treatments
Keywords
cortical bone, strain rate sensitivity, microcracking, fracture process, tensile failure, bone toughness, ductile-to-brittle transition, energy absorption, femoral bone, damage localization, bone mechanical properties
MeSH terms
Computer Simulation, Femur, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Models, Biological, Stress, Mechanical, Tensile Strength, Elastic Modulus, In Vitro Techniques

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review