Cited by 206Cerebral Palsy and Movement DisordersMuscle activation and electromyography studiesLower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies

Muscle Contributions to Support and Progression during Single-Limb Stance in Crouch Gait

Open access
Steele, Katherine M., Seth, Ajay, Hicks, Jennifer L., Schwartz, Michael S., Delp, Scott L.·2010·Journal of Biomechanics

Abstract

Pathological movement patterns like crouch gait are characterized by abnormal kinematics and muscle activations that alter how muscles support the body weight during walking. Individual muscles are often the target of interventions to improve crouch gait, yet the roles of individual muscles during crouch gait remain unknown. The goal of this study was to examine how muscles contribute to mass center accelerations and joint angular accelerations during single-limb stance in crouch gait, and compare these contributions to unimpaired gait. Subject-specific dynamic simulations were created for ten children who walked in a mild crouch gait and had no previous surgeries. The simulations were analyzed to determine the acceleration of the mass center and angular accelerations of the hip, knee, and ankle generated by individual muscles. The results of this analysis indicate that children walking in crouch gait have less passive skeletal support of body weight and utilize substantially higher muscle forces to walk than unimpaired individuals. Crouch gait relies on the same muscles as unimpaired gait to accelerate the mass center upward, including the soleus, vasti, gastrocnemius, gluteus medius, rectus femoris, and gluteus maximus. However, during crouch gait, these muscles are active throughout single-limb stance, in contrast to the modulation of muscle forces seen during single-limb stance in an unimpaired gait. Subjects walking in crouch gait rely more on proximal muscles, including the gluteus medius and hamstrings, to accelerate the mass center forward during single-limb stance than subjects with an unimpaired gait.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.04.003

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Children with ITW may adopt compensatory strategies such as increased cadence or prolonged swing duration to compensate for reduced hip flexion and maintain walking speeds comparable to typically developing peers.

    “To compensate for these deficits, children with ITW may adopt strategies such as increased cadence or prolonged swing duration.”

    From Sagittal Plane Kinematic Deviations and Spatio-Temporal Gait Characteristics in Children with Idiopathic Toe Walking: A Comparative Analysis Using Statistical Parametric Mapping (2025) · cites this paper as [41]

    The Methods (Subjects; page unavailable) describe children with cerebral palsy and mild crouch gait, not children with idiopathic toe walking (ITW). The Discussion (page unavailable) concerns muscle strategies during single-limb stance and says the findings may not extend to other gait populations. Searches for increased cadence, prolonged swing duration, and ITW found no passage addressing the attributed compensatory strategies. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Steele, K. M., Seth, A., Hicks, J. L., Schwartz, M. S., & Delp, S. L.
Affiliations
  • Stanford University (US)
  • University of Minnesota (US)
Corresponding author
Steele, Katherine M.
Venue
Journal of Biomechanics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-08
Volume
43
Issue
11
Pages
2099-2105
ISSN
0021-9290 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2027192020
Cited by
206
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 10
FWCI
8.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Biomechanics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • National Institutes of Health (R01-HD046814, R01-HD33929, U54GM072970)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Muscle activation and electromyography studies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
Keywords
crouch gait, single-leg stance, center of mass acceleration, body weight support, children, dynamic simulation, muscle activation, gluteus medius, hamstrings, gait disturbance
MeSH terms
Cerebral Palsy, Child, Computer Simulation, Gait, Humans, Leg, Models, Biological, Posture, Muscle, Skeletal, Gait Disorders, Neurologic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review