Cited by 95Mesenchymal stem cell researchBone Tissue Engineering MaterialsCellular Mechanics and Interactions

Detection of the osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells in 2D and 3D cultures by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy

Hildebrandt, Cornelia, Büth, Heiko, Cho, Sungbo, Impidjati, Thielecke, Hagen·2010·Journal of Biotechnology

Abstract

Human mesenchymal stem cells are promising candidates for cell-based therapies since they have the capacity to differentiate into a variety of cell types. However, the acceptance of hMSCs for clinical applications as well as in vitro tissue models will depend on strategies for standard characterisations. Impedance spectroscopy is a proven and powerful tool for non-invasive monitoring of cellular processes. The aim of this study was to prove the hypothesis, that the process of osteogenic differentiation can be monitored non-invasively and time-continuously by using impedance spectroscopy. This hypothesis was examined for 2D cell layers of hMSCs by continuous impedance spectroscopy employing a planar electrode-based chip and for 3D aggregates of hMSCs after 21 and 25 days of osteogenic treatment by using a capillary measurement system. The impedance spectra of osteogenic treated hMSCs reported a significant increase of the magnitude of impedance compared to controls cultivated in normal growth medium. The osteogenic status of the cells was determined by alkaline phosphatase expression and von Kossa staining. In respect to that finding it is concluded that impedance spectroscopy is an appropriate method for non-invasive characterisation of osteogenic differentiation of hMSCs, which is relevant for quality control of cell-based implants and cell-based test systems for drug development.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2010.01.007

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 46 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hildebrandt, C., Büth, H., Cho, S., Impidjati, & Thielecke, H.
Affiliations
Fraunhofer Institute for Biomedical Engineering (DE)
Corresponding author
Thielecke, Hagen
Venue
Journal of Biotechnology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-07
Volume
148
Issue
1
Pages
83-90
ISSN
0168-1656 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1985983525
Cited by
95
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 9
FWCI
3.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Biotechnology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Publikationsdatenbank der Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft (Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft) (submittedVersion)
  • Fraunhofer-Publica (Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics › Mesenchymal stem cell research
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Cellular Mechanics and Interactions
Keywords
human mesenchymal stem cells, osteogenic differentiation, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy, non-invasive cell monitoring, 3D cell aggregates, alkaline phosphatase, von Kossa staining
MeSH terms
Aged, Cell Aggregation, Cell Differentiation, Cells, Cultured, Humans, Osteogenesis, Spectrum Analysis, Electric Impedance, Cell Culture Techniques, Mesenchymal Stem Cells

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review