Cited by 58Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchMemory Processes and InfluencesMemory, History, Trauma, Identity

The importance of context: Evidence that contextual representations increase intrusive memories

Pearson, David G., Ross, Fiona D.C., Webster, Victoria L.·2012·Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry

Abstract

Background and objectives Intrusive memories appear to enter consciousness via involuntary rather than deliberate recollection. Some clinical accounts of PTSD seek to explain this phenomenon by making a clear distinction between the encoding of sensory-based and contextual representations. Contextual representations have been claimed to actively reduce intrusions by anchoring encoded perceptual data for an event in memory. The current analogue trauma study examined this hypothesis by manipulating contextual information independently from encoded sensory-perceptual information. Method Participants' viewed images selected from the International Affective Picture System that depicted scenes of violence and bodily injury. Images were viewed either under neutral conditions or paired with contextual information. Results Two experiments revealed a significant increase in memory intrusions for images paired with contextual information in comparison to the same images viewed under neutral conditions. In contrast to the observed increase in intrusion frequency there was no effect of contextual representations on voluntary memory for the images. The vividness and emotionality of memory intrusions were also unaffected. Limitations The analogue trauma paradigm may fail to replicate the effect of extreme stress on encoding postulated to occur during PTSD. Conclusions These findings question the assertion that intrusive memories develop from a lack of integration between sensory-based and c…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jbtep.2011.07.009

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pearson, D. G., Ross, F. D. C., & Webster, V. L.
Affiliations
University of Aberdeen (GB)
Corresponding author
Pearson, David G.
Venue
Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-03
Volume
43
Issue
1
Pages
573-580
ISSN
0005-7916 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2079767333
Cited by
58
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 4
FWCI
6.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Memory, History, Trauma, Identity
Keywords
intrusive memories, context representation, post-traumatic stress disorder, memory encoding, memory vividness
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Analysis of Variance, Cues, Emotions, Female, Humans, Male, Memory Disorders, Neuropsychological Tests, Photic Stimulation, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Mental Recall, Visual Perception, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review