Cited by 73Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum DisordersAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research

The relationship between anxiety sensitivity and obsessive-compulsive symptom dimensions

Wheaton, Michael G., Mahaffey, Brittain, Timpano, Kiara R., Berman, Noah C., Abramowitz, Jonathan S.·2012·Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry

Abstract

Background and objectives Anxiety sensitivity (AS), the tendency to fear arousal-related body sensations based on beliefs that they are dangerous, is a cognitive vulnerability factor for certain anxiety symptoms such as panic and posttraumatic stress symptoms. Very little research, however, has examined the relationship between AS and obsessive-compulsive (OC) symptoms, which was the objective of the current research. Methods We administered dimensional measures of AS and OC symptoms to a large sample of undergraduate students (N = 636). We also included measures of general distress and cognitive distortions related to OCD (i.e., obsessive beliefs) as control variables. Results Regression analyses indicated that AS was predictive of OC symptoms even after controlling for general distress and obsessive beliefs. In addition, the three domains of AS (physical, social, and cognitive concerns) were differentially associated with the four dimensions of OC symptoms (contamination, responsibility for harm, symmetry, and unacceptable thoughts). Limitations Our findings are based on a non-clinical student sample and their generalization to OCD requires replication with a sample of OCD patients. Conclusions These results provide preliminary evidence that AS plays a role in OC symptoms. Implications for clinical practice and for future research are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jbtep.2012.01.001

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wheaton, M. G., Mahaffey, B., Timpano, K. R., Berman, N. C., & Abramowitz, J. S.
Affiliations
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
  • University of Miami (US)
Corresponding author
Abramowitz, Jonathan S.
Venue
Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-09
Volume
43
Issue
3
Pages
891-896
ISSN
0005-7916 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2029164721
Cited by
73
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 3
FWCI
5.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Keywords
anxiety sensitivity, obsessive-compulsive symptoms, obsessive-compulsive disorder, contamination, responsibility for harm, symmetry, unacceptable thoughts, cognitive vulnerability, obsessive beliefs, cognitive distortions, general distress, undergraduate students
MeSH terms
Adult, Anxiety, Depression, Female, Humans, Male, Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychometrics, Stress, Psychological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review