Cited by 44Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMemory and Neural MechanismsPosttraumatic Stress Disorder Research

Exposure treatment in multiple contexts attenuates return of fear via renewal in high spider fearful individuals

Open access
Bandarian-Balooch, Siavash, Neumann, David L., Boschen, Mark J.·2015·Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry

Abstract

Background and objectives Research has demonstrated that after exposure treatment, re-exposure to a previously feared stimulus outside of the treatment context can result in renewal of fear. The current study investigated whether conducting exposure treatment in multiple real-life contexts can attenuate renewal of fear. Methods Forty-six moderate to high spider fearful individuals were randomly allocated to groups that received exposure treatment in either one context or three contexts. Follow-up testing was conducted one week and four weeks after exposure in the treatment context or a novel context. Results Renewal of fear was found for the single extinction context group when exposed to the feared object in a novel context with self-report of fear, heart rate, and behavioural avoidance. However, renewal of fear was attenuated for the multiple extinction context group. Limitations The sample included moderate to high spider fearful participants rather than clients with spider phobia, potentially limiting the generalisability of the findings to clinical populations. Conclusions Using multiple extinction contexts in combination with other methods of attenuating renewal (e.g., context similarity) may provide a means to reduce the risk of renewal of fear.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jbtep.2014.12.006

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In laboratory studies, using multiple contexts during exposure led to less renewal of fear in spider phobia and snake phobia than single-context exposure.

    “In laboratory studies, the use of multiple contexts during exposure has led to less renewal of fear in those with spider phobia (Bandarian-Balooch, Neumann, & Boschen, 2015; Shiban, Pauli, & Mühlberger, 2013) and snake phobia (Olatunji, Tomarken, Wentworth, & Fritzsche, 2017) compared to those with whom exposure was conducted in a single context.”

    From Enhancing Inhibitory Learning: The Utility of Variability in Exposure (2019) · cites this paper as Bandarian-Balooch, Neumann, & Boschen, 2015

    The Discussion reports that fear renewal occurred after single-context exposure and was attenuated after multiple-context exposure. But the Method Participants and Discussion specify that this study involved people with moderate to high spider fear who were not formally assessed for spider phobia; it does not establish the result for people with spider phobia. The sentence attributes the snake-phobia finding to a different citation. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. Bandarian-Balooch, S., Neumann, D. L., & Boschen, M. J. (2012a). Context effects on memory retrieval following the Pavlovian extinction process in humans and its application in the reduction of return of fear. In D.L., Neumann & G., Andrews (Eds), Beyond the Lab: Applications of Cognitive Research in Memory and Learning (pp. 57- 82). New York: Nova Science Publishers.
  2. Boschen, M. J., Neumann, D. L., & Waters, A. M. (2009). Relapse of successfully treated anxiety and fear: Theoretical issues and recommendations for clinical practice. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 43, 89-100.
  3. Bouton, M. E. (1993). Context, time, and memory retrieval in the interference paradigms of Pavlovian learning. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 80-99.
  4. Bouton, M. E. (1994). Conditioning remembering and forgetting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behaviour Processes, 20, 219-231.
  5. Bouton, M. E., & Swartzentruber, D. (1991). Sources of relapse after extinction in Pavlovian and instrumental learning. Clinical Psychology Review, 11, 123-140.
  6. Carr, E. G., & Durand, V. M. (1985). Reducing behaviour problems through functional communication training. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 18, 111-126.
  7. Culver, C. N., Stoyanova, M., & Craske, G. M. (2011). Clinical relevance of retrieval cues for attenuating context renewal of fear. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 25, 284-292.
  8. Dibbets, P., Moor, C., & Voncken, M. J. (2013). The effect of a retrieval cue on the return of spider fear. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 44, 361-367.
  9. Mineka, S., Mystkowski, J. L., Hladek, D., & Rodriquez, B. I. (1999). The effects of changing contexts on return of fear following exposure treatment for spider fear. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67, 599-604.
  10. Neumann, D. L., Boschen, M. J., & Waters, A. M. (2008). The return of extinguished conditioned behaviour in humans: New research and future directions. In L. N. Piccard (Ed.). Biological Psychology: New Research (pp. 1-42). New York: Nova Science Publishers.
  11. Rosas, J. M., Callejas-Aguilera, J. E., Ramos-Álvarez, M. M., & Abad, M. J. F. (2006). Revision of Retrieval Theory of Forgetting: What does Make Information Context- Specific? International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 6, 147-166.
  12. Rose, M. P., & McGlynn, F. D. (1997). Toward a standard experiment for studying post treatment return of fear. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 11, 263-277.
  13. Stokes, T. E, & Baer, D. M. (1977). An implicit technology of generalization. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 10, 349-367.
  14. Wolpe, J. (1958). Psychotherapy by reciprocal inhibition. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  15. Wolpe, J. (1973). The practice of behavior therapy. New York: Pergamon Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bandarian-Balooch, S., Neumann, D. L., & Boschen, M. J.
Affiliations
Griffith University (AU)
Venue
Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-06
Volume
47
Pages
138-144
ISSN
0005-7916 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2035012538
Cited by
44
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2
FWCI
2.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
Keywords
fear extinction, fear renewal, exposure therapy, spider phobia, contextual similarity, avoidance behavior, heart rate, anxiety disorders
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Animals, Avoidance Learning, Conditioning, Classical, Extinction, Psychological, Fear, Female, Heart Rate, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Phobic Disorders, Recurrence, Spiders, Time Factors, Treatment Outcome, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review