Cited by 162Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMemory and Neural MechanismsVirtual Reality Applications and Impacts

Effect of multiple context exposure on renewal in spider phobia

Shiban, Youssef, Pauli, Paul, Mühlberger, Andreas·2013·Behaviour Research and Therapy

Abstract

Background Renewal of fear is one form of relapse that occurs after successful exposure therapy as a result of an encounter with a feared object in a context different from the exposure context. The current study is the first to examine whether virtual reality (VR) exposure conducted in multiple contexts reduces the likelihood of renewal.Method Thirty spider-phobic patients were randomly allocated to one of two groups that were exposed to a virtual spider four times either in a single context or in multiple contexts. All participants completed a renewal test in a novel virtual context, and an in-vivo behavior avoidance test with a real spider before and after exposure.Results As reflected in the ratings, skin conductance level, and behavioral measures, the fear of spiders decreased significantly in both groups within and between the exposure trials and from pre to post exposure. Importantly, extinction in multiple contexts was able to significantly reduce renewal compared to extinction in a single context.Conclusions Based on highly controlled context manipulations using VR, this study was able to successfully transfer animal work to phobic patients. These findings strongly suggest that exposure in multiple contexts improves the generalizability of exposure to a new context. Consequently, we recommend the application of multiple context exposures in a clinical setting to reduce the likelihood of renewal. In addition, virtual reality was demonstrated to be a helpful tool for inducing contextual shifts during the exposures.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.brat.2012.10.007

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In laboratory studies, using multiple contexts during exposure led to less renewal of fear in spider phobia and snake phobia than single-context exposure.

    “In laboratory studies, the use of multiple contexts during exposure has led to less renewal of fear in those with spider phobia (Bandarian-Balooch, Neumann, & Boschen, 2015; Shiban, Pauli, & Mühlberger, 2013) and snake phobia (Olatunji, Tomarken, Wentworth, & Fritzsche, 2017) compared to those with whom exposure was conducted in a single context.”

    From Enhancing Inhibitory Learning: The Utility of Variability in Exposure (2019) · cites this paper as Shiban, Pauli, & Mühlberger, 2013

  • There is fairly large variance in treatment outcomes between different VRET studies.

    “However, there is fairly large variance in treatment outcomes between different VRET studies”
  • VR/AR facilitates exposure to different contexts, producing a positive effect in terms of fear renewal and generalization of results.

    “Regarding this last strategy, as mentioned above, VR/AR facilitates the exposure to different contexts, producing a positive effect in terms of fear renewal and generalization of results [75,76,87].”
  • Exposure to multiple virtual contexts and multiple virtual phobic stimuli reduces the recurrence of fear to a greater extent than exposure to only one scenario and the same stimuli, making it possible to generalize the results.

    “Results showed that exposure to multiple virtual contexts and multiple virtual phobic stimuli reduced the recurrence of fear to a greater extent than exposure to only one scenario and the same stimuli, making it possible to generalize the results.”
  • The data from this study coincide with findings from studies where VR was used to treat specific phobia (animal subtype), where VR was effective in reducing fear and avoidance.

    “Similarly, data from the present study also coincide with findings from studies where VR was used to treat SP (animal subtype), such as those by [31, 33–35,75,76]; where VR was effective in reducing the fear and avoidance experienced by the participants.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shiban, Y., Pauli, P., & Mühlberger, A.
Affiliations
University of Würzburg (DE)
Corresponding author
Mühlberger, Andreas
Venue
Behaviour Research and Therapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-02
Volume
51
Issue
2
Pages
68-74
ISSN
0005-7967 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1997352122
Cited by
162
References
32
Citations by year
2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 6
FWCI
12.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behaviour Research and Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
  • Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
Keywords
spider phobia, fear extinction, renewal, virtual reality exposure therapy, skin conductance, avoidance behavior, phobia treatment
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Analysis of Variance, Animals, Fear, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Phobic Disorders, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Spiders, Young Adult, Virtual Reality Exposure Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review