The DOI matches its Crossref record; 49 of the 49 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Embrace•perform•model: Complexity theory, contrarian case analysis, and multiple realities
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes.
Nisbett, R. E., & Wilson, T. D. (1977) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.84.3.231 · Cited by 11,317
Research in Organizational Behavior
Hammer, E. R., Cummings, L. L., & Staw, B. M. (1984) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258300 · Cited by 10,806
Building Better Causal Theories: A Fuzzy Set Approach to Typologies in Organization Research
Fiss, P. C. (2011) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2011.60263120 · Cited by 5,930
The unbearable automaticity of being
Bargh, J. A., & Chartrand, T. L. (1999) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.54.7.462 · Cited by 3,699 · cited 1×
“…long-term memory, edit the retrieved information for relevancy and selfprotection, and report in a format and style usually to appear sane and accurate to some degree; responses following these steps quite often have little relationship to reality (Bargh & Chartrand, 1999; Nesbitt & Wilson, 1977).”
BackgroundInfluentialRedesigning Social Inquiry: Fuzzy Sets and Beyond
Ragin, C. C. (2008) · Cited by 3,398
Lieberson, S., & Ragin, C. C. (2001) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/3089736 · Cited by 2,799
Marketing Management: Analysis, Planning and Control
Borden, N. H., & Kotler, P. (1973) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.2307/1250783 · Cited by 2,439
A set-theoretic approach to organizational configurations
Fiss, P. C. (2007) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2007.26586092 · Cited by 2,225
Perspective: Complexity Theory and Organization Science
Anderson, P. (1999) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.10.3.216 · Cited by 2,118
Managing the unexpected: resilient performance in an age of uncertainty
(2008) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.45-3293 · Cited by 1,968
Cited by
Pappas, I. O., & Woodside, A. G. (2021) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102310 · Cited by 2,254
Self-citationMikalef, P., & Pateli, A. (2017) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.09.004 · Cited by 1,038
Big data analytics and firm performance: Findings from a mixed-method approach
Mikalef, P., Boura, M., Lekakos, G., & Krogstie, J. (2019) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.01.044 · Cited by 722
Kraus, S., Ribeiro-Soriano, D., & Schüssler, M. (2018) · International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal · doi:10.1007/s11365-017-0461-8 · Cited by 709
Risk assessment of halal products and services: Implication for tourism industry
Olya, H. G. T., & Al-ansi, A. (2018) · Tourism Management · doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2017.10.015 · Cited by 348
Metadata
- Authors
- Woodside, A. G.
- Venue
- Journal of Business Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-12
- Volume
- 67
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 2495-2503
- ISSN
- 0148-2963 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1982008157
- Cited by
- 927
- References
- 49
- FWCI
- 50.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Embrace•perform•model: Complexity theory, contrarian case analysis, and multiple realities. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.07.006
- The paper
- Woodside, A. G. (2014). Embrace•perform•model: Complexity theory, contrarian case analysis, and multiple realities. Journal of Business Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.07.006
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
