The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The role of ICT and innovation in enhancing organizational performance: The catalysing effect of corporate entrepreneurship
Open accessAbstract
Abstract Information and communication technologies (ICT)-based innovations and applications have become major drivers of enhanced organizational performance, economic growth, and social change. However, although the body of research that is pertinent to this area has substantially grown, the importance of complementary factors such as corporate entrepreneurship in enhancing the impact of technological innovation on organizational performance has yet to be addressed. This paper develops and tests a framework that depicts and examines the nature of the relationship between ICT-adoption/use and organizational performance in the Lebanese market, taking into consideration the impact that corporate entrepreneurship may have on this relationship. PLS is used to test the proposed relationships along with the significance of the mediation effect of corporate entrepreneurship. A multigroup analysis is also deployed to examine the impact of ICT-use level on the model. The proposed model is proven to be fit, the hypotheses are supported, and the implications are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology
Kogut, B., & Zander, U. (1992) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.3.3.383 · Cited by 12,939 · cited 1×
“This can be accompanied by a steady learning process (Gomez, Cespedes-Lorente, & Valle-Cabrera, 2005) and the seizing of new opportunities (Kogut & Zander, 1992), acquiring knowledge from all reachable resources (Prahalad & Hamel, 1990), and thus making appropriate decisions.”
BackgroundClarifying the Entrepreneurial Orientation Construct and Linking It to Performance
Lumpkin, G. T., & Dess, G. G. (1996) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1996.9602161568 · Cited by 10,159
Bootstrap Methods and their Application
Davison, A. C., & Hinkley, D. V. (1997) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511802843 · Cited by 7,350 · cited 1×
“The signi fi cance of the path coe ffi cients were determined using boot-strapping with 5000 iterations of resampling (Davison & Hinkley, 1997).”
MethodTechnological paradigms and technological trajectories
Dosi, G. (1982) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/0048-7333(82)90016-6 · Cited by 6,685
The correlates of entrepreneurship in three types of firms
Miller, D. (1983) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.29.7.770 · Cited by 5,853
Notes on the theory of the actor-network: Ordering, strategy, and heterogeneity
Law, J. (1992) · Systems Practice · doi:10.1007/bf01059830 · Cited by 3,244
The productivity paradox of information technology
Brynjolfsson, E. (1993) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/163298.163309 · Cited by 2,604
Information Technology and Organizational Change: Causal Structure in Theory and Research
Markus, M. L., & Robey, D. (1988) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.34.5.583 · Cited by 2,108
Risk Taking Propensity of Entrepreneurs.
Brockhaus, R. H. (1980) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/255515 · Cited by 1,733
A General Approach for Representing Constructs in Organizational Research
Bagozzi, R. P., & Edwards, J. R. (1998) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/109442819800100104 · Cited by 1,217
Resource management in big data initiatives: processes and dynamic capabilities
Braganza, A., Brooks, L., Nepelski, D., Ali, M., & Moro, R. (2017) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.08.006 · Cited by 339
Cited by
Unveiling the impact of the adoption of digital technologies on firms’ innovation performance
Usai, A., Fiano, F., Messeni Petruzzelli, A., Paoloni, P., Farina Briamonte, M., & Orlando, B. (2021) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.035 · Cited by 553
Shahadat, M. M. H., Nekmahmud, M., Ebrahimi, P., & Fekete-Farkas, M. (2023) · Global Business Review · doi:10.1177/09721509221137199 · Cited by 247
Does digital investment affect carbon efficiency? Spatial effect and mechanism discussion
Xu, Q., Zhong, M., & Cao, M. (2022) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.154321 · Cited by 201
Capestro, M., Rizzo, C., Kliestik, T., Peluso, A. M., & Pino, G. (2024) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2023.123003 · Cited by 105
Khattak, A., Tabash, M. I., Yousaf, Z., Radulescu, M., Nassani, A. A., & Haffar, M. (2022) · Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies · doi:10.1108/jeee-08-2021-0318 · Cited by 72
Metadata
- Authors
- Yunis, M., Tarhini, A., & Kassar, A.
- Venue
- Journal of Business Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-07
- Volume
- 88
- Pages
- 344-356
- ISSN
- 0148-2963 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2779824239
- Cited by
- 393
- References
- 11
- FWCI
- 27.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
