Cited by 139Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and IdentificationConsumer Perception and Purchasing BehaviorConsumer Market Behavior and Pricing

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Feeling inferior, showing off: The effect of nonmaterial social comparisons on conspicuous consumption

Zheng, Xiaoying, Baskin, Ernest, Peng, Siqing·2018·Journal of Business Research

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.04.041

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Social comparison increases the tendency of consumers with low self-concept clarity to engage in conspicuous consumption.

    “We can infer from previous studies that self-concept clarity negatively affects conspicuous consumption (Chakraborty & Chattaraman, 2025), social comparison increases the tendency of consumers with low self-concept clarity to engage in conspicuous consumption (Zheng et al., 2018), self-uncertainty increases the tendency towards conspicuous consumption (Wang et al., 2023), and individuals with low”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 46

  1. Adler, 1927, Individual psychology, The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 22, 116, 10.1037/h0072190 · DOI
  2. Banerjee, 2007, The economic lives of the poor, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 21, 141, 10.1257/089533007780095556 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Brewer, 1994, Self-evaluation effects of interpersonal versus intergroup social comparison, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 268, 10.1037/0022-3514.66.2.268 · DOI
  4. Brown, 1992, When Gulliver travels: Social context, psychological closeness, and self-appraisals, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 717, 10.1037/0022-3514.62.5.717 · DOI
  5. Buunk, 1990, The affective consequences of social comparison: Either direction has its ups and downs, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1238, 10.1037/0022-3514.59.6.1238 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Charles, 2009, Conspicuous consumption and race, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 124, 425, 10.1162/qjec.2009.124.2.425 · DOI
  7. Cho, 2018, It's a match when green meets healthy in sustainability labeling, Journal of Business Research, 86, 119, 10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.01.050 · DOI
  8. Christen, 2005, Keeping up with the Joneses: Analyzing the effect of income inequality on consumer borrowing, Quantitative Marketing and Economics, 3, 145, 10.1007/s11129-005-0351-1 · DOI
  9. Colpaert, 2015, A mindset of competition versus cooperation moderates the impact of social comparison on self-evaluation, Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01337 · DOI
  10. Crusius, 2012, When people want what others have: The impulsive side of envious desire, Emotion, 12, 142, 10.1037/a0023523 · DOI
  11. Elbedweihy, 2016, Customer relationship building: The role of brand attractiveness and consumer–brand identification, Journal of Business Research, 69, 2901, 10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.12.059 · DOI
  12. Festinger, 1954, A theory of social comparison processes, Human Relations, 7, 117, 10.1177/001872675400700202 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Frank, 1985, The demand for unobservable and other nonpositional goods, The American Economic Review, 75, 101
  14. Frederick, 2014, Limits of attraction, Journal of Marketing Research, 51, 487, 10.1509/jmr.12.0061 · DOI
  15. Gilbert, 1995, When comparisons arise, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 227, 10.1037/0022-3514.69.2.227 · DOI
  16. Griskevicius, 2007, Blatant benevolence and conspicuous consumption: When romantic motives elicit strategic costly signals, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 85, 10.1037/0022-3514.93.1.85 · DOI
  17. Gurzki, 2017, Mapping the luxury research landscape: A bibliometric citation analysis, Journal of Business Research, 77, 147, 10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.11.009 · DOI
  18. Healy, 2013, Consumer roles in brand culture and value co-creation in virtual communities, Journal of Business Research, 66, 1528, 10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.09.014 · DOI
  19. Johnson, 2012, Behavioral responses to threatening social comparisons: From dastardly deeds to rising above, Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 6, 515, 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2012.00445.x · DOI
  20. Kastanakis, 2014, Explaining variation in conspicuous luxury consumption: An individual differences' perspective, Journal of Business Research, 67, 2147, 10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.04.024 · DOI
  21. Kaus, 2013, Conspicuous consumption and “race”: Evidence from South Africa, Journal of Development Economics, 100, 63, 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2012.07.004 · DOI
  22. Kim, 2014, From compensatory consumption to adaptive consumption: The role of self-acceptance in resolving self-deficits, Journal of Consumer Research, 41, 526, 10.1086/676681 · DOI
  23. Lee, 2012, Conspicuous consumption versus charitable behavior in response to social exclusion: A differential needs explanation, Journal of Consumer Research, 39, 530, 10.1086/664039 · DOI
  24. Lertwannawit, 2012, Interpersonal effects on fashion consciousness and status consumption moderated by materialism in metropolitan men, Journal of Business Research, 65, 1408, 10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.10.006 · DOI
  25. Lockwood, 1997, Superstars and me: Predicting the impact of role models on the self, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 91, 10.1037/0022-3514.73.1.91 · DOI
  26. Marx, 2009, The “Obama effect”: How a salient role model reduces race-based performance differences, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 953, 10.1016/j.jesp.2009.03.012 · DOI
  27. Mead, 2011, Social exclusion causes people to spend and consume strategically in the service of affiliation, Journal of Consumer Research, 37, 902, 10.1086/656667 · DOI
  28. Morrison, 2011, When what you have is who you are: Self-uncertainty leads individualists to see themselves in their possessions, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 639, 10.1177/0146167211403158 · DOI
  29. Morse, 1970, Social comparison, self-consistency, and the concept of self, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 16, 148, 10.1037/h0029862 · DOI
  30. Muller, 2010, On being exposed to superior others: Consequences of self-threatening upward social comparisons, Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4, 621, 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2010.00279.x · DOI
  31. Munichor, 2016, Saying no to the glow: When consumers avoid arrogant brands, Journal of Consumer Psychology, 26, 179, 10.1016/j.jcps.2015.05.004 · DOI
  32. Mussweiler, 2004, The man who wasn't there: Subliminal social comparison standards influence self-evaluation, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 689, 10.1016/j.jesp.2004.01.004 · DOI
  33. Pelham, 1995, The waxing and waning of the social self: Assimilation and contrast in social comparison, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 825, 10.1037/0022-3514.69.5.825 · DOI
  34. Preacher, 2008, Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models, Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879, 10.3758/BRM.40.3.879 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Rucker, 2008, Desire to acquire: Powerlessness and compensatory consumption, Journal of Consumer Research, 35, 257, 10.1086/588569 · DOI · Paper page
  36. Schwarz, 2007, Mental construal processes: The inclusion/exclusion model. Assimilation and contrast in, Social Psychology, 119
  37. Seta, 1982, The impact of comparison processes on coactors' task performance, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 281, 10.1037/0022-3514.42.2.281 · DOI
  38. Sheth, 1991, Why we buy what we buy: A theory of consumption values, Journal of Business Research, 22, 159, 10.1016/0148-2963(91)90050-8 · DOI · Paper page
  39. Shrum, 2013, Reconceptualizing materialism as identity goal pursuits: Functions, processes, and consequences, Journal of Business Research, 66, 1179, 10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.08.010 · DOI
  40. Sobol, 2014, “I'd like to be that attractive, but at least I'm smart”: How exposure to ideal advertising models motivates improved decision-making, Journal of Consumer Psychology, 24, 533, 10.1016/j.jcps.2014.03.005 · DOI
  41. Solomon, 1983, The role of products as social stimuli: A symbolic interactionism perspective, Journal of Consumer Research, 10, 319, 10.1086/208971 · DOI
  42. Spiller, 2013, Spotlights, floodlights, and the magic number zero: Simple effects tests in moderated regression, Journal of Marketing Research, 50, 277, 10.1509/jmr.12.0420 · DOI
  43. Van de Ven, 2011, The envy premium in product evaluation, Journal of Consumer Research, 37, 984, 10.1086/657239 · DOI
  44. Watson, 1988, Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063, 10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063 · DOI · Paper page
  45. Wicklund, 1981, Symbolic self-completion, attempted influence, and self-deprecation, Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 2, 89, 10.1207/s15324834basp0202_2 · DOI · Paper page
  46. Zheng, 2018, The spillover effect of incidental social comparison on materialistic pursuits: The mediating role of envy, European Journal of Marketing, 52, 1107, 10.1108/EJM-04-2016-0208 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Zheng, X., Baskin, E., & Peng, S.
Affiliations
  • Nankai University (CN)
  • Saint Joseph's University (US)
  • Peking University (CN)
Corresponding author
Zheng, Xiaoying
Venue
Journal of Business Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-09
Volume
90
Pages
196-205
ISSN
0148-2963 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2803545034
Cited by
139
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 4
FWCI
11.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Business Research (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (71602093, 71372025)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Perception and Purchasing Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing
Keywords
conspicuous consumption, keeping up with the Joneses, compensatory consumption, social comparison theory, self-concept, inferiority, consumer spending behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review