The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A bibliometric analysis of board diversity: Current status, development, and future research directions
Abstract
Abstract This study identifies the main areas and current dynamics of the field of board diversity and suggests future research directions. Using a bibliometric analysis, we examine a sample of 579 studies from the ISI Web of Science database to identify research activity on board diversity between 1999 and early 2019. We find the most influential articles and authors based on their citations and publications as well as their location and importance within the network. We also examine current themes, find impediments to growth in the literature, and suggest avenues for future research. Although research activity on board diversity occurs globally, a lack of collaboration exists across country lines, especially between authors of developed and developing countries. Research on board diversity focuses on gender diversity, with relatively less attention on age, nationality, ethnicity, professional background, and cognition. We conclude by suggesting five potential research directions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The anatomy of a large-scale hypertextual Web search engine
Brin, S., & Page, L. (1998) · Computer Networks and ISDN Systems · doi:10.1016/s0169-7552(98)00110-x · Cited by 16,004
Gephi: An Open Source Software for Exploring and Manipulating Networks
Bastian, M., Heymann, S., & Jacomy, M. (2009) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v3i1.13937 · Cited by 11,675
Defining and identifying communities in networks
Radicchi, F., Castellano, C., Cecconi, F., Loreto, V., & Parisi, D. (2004) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0400054101 · Cited by 2,450
Factors Affecting Number of Citations: A Comprehensive Review of the Literature
Tahamtan, I., Safipour Afshar, A., & Ahamdzadeh, K. (2016) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-016-1889-2 · Cited by 912
Cited by
How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines
Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070 · Cited by 14,329
Self-citationScientific procedures and rationales for systematic literature reviews (SPAR‐4‐SLR)
Paul, J., Lim, W. M., O’Cass, A., Hao, A. W., & Bresciani, S. (2021) · International Journal of Consumer Studies · doi:10.1111/ijcs.12695 · Cited by 2,364
Khatib, S. F. A., Abdullah, D. F., Elamer, A. A., & Abueid, R. (2021) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.2665 · Cited by 322
Gao, B., Wang, Y., Xie, H., Hu, Y., & Hu, Y. (2023) · Sage Open · doi:10.1177/21582440231210759 · Cited by 244
Generative AI in Marketing: Foundations, Trends, and Future Research Propositions
Prasanna, A., & Kushwaha, B. P. (2025) · Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies · doi:10.1155/hbe2/5542513 · Cited by 10
Metadata
- Authors
- Kent Baker, H., Pandey, N., Kumar, S., & Haldar, A.
- Venue
- Journal of Business Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-01
- Volume
- 108
- Pages
- 232-246
- ISSN
- 0148-2963 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2990688366
- Cited by
- 620
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 75.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A bibliometric analysis of board diversity: Current status, development, and future research directions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.11.025
- The paper
- Kent Baker, H., Pandey, N., Kumar, S., & Haldar, A. (2020). A bibliometric analysis of board diversity: Current status, development, and future research directions. Journal of Business Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.11.025
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
