Cited by 401International Business and FDIInnovation and Knowledge ManagementCorporate Finance and Governance

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 220 of the 223 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Five decades of research on foreign direct investment by MNEs: An overview and research agenda

Open access
Paul, Justin, Feliciano-Cestero, María M.·2021·Journal of Business Research

Abstract

Despite the significance attached to foreign direct investment (FDI) by Multinational enterprises (MNEs), there are is no comprehensive review of the FDI literature. Moreover, those that have been published, focus on subsets of FDI. This review systematically examines the empirical as well as theoretical research on FDI through an analysis of 500 articles published during the last five decades. Theoretical models, methods, context, and contributions to scholarship were reviewed. We strive to highlight the key theories, paradigms, and articles and provide directions for future research. We conclude that FDI has evolved as the most significant area of international business.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.04.017

Cites

220 of 220 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 223 references

3 of the 223 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Buckley, 1976, Vol. 1
  2. Cannon, 2014, How Uber and the sharing economy can win over regulators, Harvard Business Review, 13, 24
  3. Enderwick, 2005, Attracting “desirable” FDI: Theory and evidence, Transnational Corporations, 14, 93
  4. Mudambi, 2008, Spikes, blocs, and the “death of distance”, Journal of International Business Studies, 39, 1091
  5. Shen-biao, 2005, Causality test on the FDI and environment pollution in Jiang-su, Zhe-jiang and Shanghai [J], International Trade Journal, 12
  6. United Nations Conference On Trade And Development (UNCTAD). (2015).World Investment Report: Reforming International Investment Governance. United Nations Publications: Geneva.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 400

Metadata

Authors
Paul, J., & Feliciano-Cestero, M. M.
Affiliations
University of Puerto Rico System (PR)
Corresponding author
Feliciano-Cestero, María M.
Venue
Journal of Business Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-01
Volume
124
Pages
800-812
ISSN
0148-2963 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3015493597
Cited by
401
References
223
Citations by year
2026: 42 · 2025: 88 · 2024: 82 · 2023: 68 · 2022: 72 · 2021: 37
FWCI
50.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Business Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › International Business and FDI
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Corporate Finance and Governance
Keywords
foreign direct investment, multinational corporations, FDI theory, international business research, research agenda

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review