Cited by 70Consumer Retail Behavior StudiesConsumer Behavior and Marketing InfluenceConsumer Market Behavior and Pricing

What women want? How contextual product displays influence women’s online shopping behavior

González, Eva M., Meyer, Jan-Hinrich, Paz Toldos, M.·2021·Journal of Business Research

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.10.002

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
González, E. M., Meyer, J.-H., & Paz Toldos, M.
Affiliations
Institut Químic de Sarrià (ES)
Venue
Journal of Business Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-02
Volume
123
Pages
625-641
ISSN
0148-2963 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3094229627
Cited by
70
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 10
FWCI
8.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Business Research (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Retail Behavior Studies
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Behavior and Marketing Influence
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing
Keywords
online shopping behavior, women consumers, purchase intention, emotional value, product presentation, price changes, product categories

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review