CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 947COVID-19 Pandemic ImpactsCorporate Management and LeadershipDigital Economy and Transformation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 70 of the 72 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

COVID-19 and digitalization: The great acceleration

Open access
Amankwah-Amoah, Joseph, Khan, Zaheer, Wood, Geoffrey, Knight, Gary·2021·Journal of Business Research
DOI 10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.08.011PMC PMC8437806
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Inspired by burgeoning scholarly interest in the role of digitalization in the COVID-19 pandemic, this paper examines how the COVID-19 pandemic is driving or constraining the digitalization of businesses around the globe. We contend that COVID-19 is "the great accelerator" in fast-tracking the existing global trend towards embracing modern emerging technologies ushering in transformations in lifestyle, work patterns, and business strategies. Thus, COVID-19 has evolved to be a kind of "catalyst" for the adoption and increasing use of digitalization in work organization and the office, alongside presenting foreseen and unforeseen opportunities, challenges, and costs-leading to negative and positive feedback loops. In this article, we develop and advance a conceptual model by linking the different forces for and against digitalization in response to the pandemic. Our analysis indicates that adoption of emerging technologies may be hindered by vested external interests, nostalgia, and employer opportunism, as well as negative effects on employee well-being that undermine productivity, work-life balance, and future of work. Whilst digitalization may bring new opportunities, the process imparts risks that may be hard to mitigate or prepare for. Finally, we draw out the wider theoretical and practical implications of our analysis.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.08.011

Cites

70 of 70 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 72 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. The Economist (2002) Business: Saving trees; Adobe versus Microsoft. 365(8298), 64.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 301–400 of 943

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Amankwah-Amoah, J., Khan, Z., Wood, G., & Knight, G.
Affiliations
  • University of Aberdeen (GB)
  • Western University (CA)
  • Willamette University (US)
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Business Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-11
Volume
136
Pages
602-611
ISSN
0148-2963 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.08.011
PMC
PMC8437806
OpenAlex
W3191826040
Cited by
947
References
72
Citations by year
2026: 132 · 2025: 195 · 2024: 235 · 2023: 237 · 2022: 134 · 2021: 12
FWCI
117.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Journal of Business Research (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Aberdeen University Research Archive (Aberdeen University) (submittedVersion)
  • Kent Academic Repository (University of Kent) (submittedVersion)
  • Osuva (University of Vaasa) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › COVID-19 Pandemic Impacts
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Corporate Management and Leadership
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Digital Economy and Transformation
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, digitalization, digital transformation, emerging technologies, work organization, remote work, employee well-being, work-life balance, future of work, conceptual model, vested interests, nostalgia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review