Cited by 0Cyberloafing and Workplace BehaviorJob Satisfaction and Organizational BehaviorEmployee Performance and Management

Enhancement or depletion: the double-edged sword effect of electronic performance monitoring on employee job performance

Nian, Pengxiang, Liu, Min, Pei, Jialiang, Liu, Shanshi·2026·Journal of Business Research

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jbusres.2026.116176

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Nian, P., Liu, M., Pei, J., & Liu, S.
Affiliations
South China University of Technology (CN)
Corresponding author
Liu, Min
Venue
Journal of Business Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2026-05
Volume
210
Pages
116176
ISSN
0148-2963 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W7149255068
Cited by
0
References
64
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Business Research (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2025M780654)
  • South China Normal University (24SK20)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (72502077, 72272054)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Cyberloafing and Workplace Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Employee Performance and Management
Keywords
electronic performance monitoring, employee performance, self-enhancement motivation, self-regulatory resources, resource depletion, self-regulation theory, remote work, employee motivation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review