Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 366

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The call of the whole in understanding the development of sustainable ventures

Open access
Muñoz, Pablo, Dimov, Dimo·2015·Journal of Business Venturing
DOI 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2014.07.012
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This paper examines the development process of sustainable ventures by focusing on three substantive markers, namely the ideas, actions, and exchange relationships articulated and instigated by the entrepreneurs in question. Based on data from 45 sustainability-oriented new ventures, it examines the causal configurations behind the manifestations of these markers using Fuzzy-Set Qualitative Comparison Analysis (fsQCA). The analysis also reveals two distinct opportunity development paths. The first, conformist, operates in an enabling supporting context as sustainability conveyor. The second, insurgent, path operates as a change agent against an establishment that is not conducive to sustainability ideals.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2014.07.012

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 64

  1. Ambec, 2008, Does it pay to be green? A systematic overview, Acad. Manag. Perspect., 22, 45, 10.5465/amp.2008.35590353 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Bird, 1988, Implementing entrepreneurial ideas: the case for intention, Acad. Manag. Rev., 13, 442, 10.5465/amr.1988.4306970 · DOI
  3. Boyd, 1994, The influence of self-efficacy on the development of entrepreneurial intentions and actions, Entrep. Theory Pract., 18, 63, 10.1177/104225879401800404 · DOI
  4. Choi, 2008, The venture development processes of “sustainable” entrepreneurs, Manag. Res. News, 31, 558, 10.1108/01409170810892127 · DOI
  5. Clemens, 2006, Economic incentives and small firms: does it pay to be green?, J. Bus. Res., 59, 492, 10.1016/j.jbusres.2005.08.006 · DOI
  6. Cohen, 2007, Market imperfections, opportunity and sustainable entrepreneurship, J. Bus. Ventur., 22, 29, 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2004.12.001 · DOI
  7. Cohen, 2008, Toward a sustainable conceptualization of dependent variables in entrepreneurship research, Bus. Strateg. Environ., 17, 107, 10.1002/bse.505 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Collier, 1995, Translating quantitative methods for qualitative researchers: the case of selection bias, Am. Polit. Sci. Rev., 89, 461, 10.2307/2082442 · DOI
  9. Coltman, 2008, Formative versus reflective measurement models: two applications of formative measurement, J. Bus. Res., 61, 1250, 10.1016/j.jbusres.2008.01.013 · DOI
  10. Crilly, 2012, Faking it or muddling through? Understanding decoupling in response to stakeholder pressures, Acad. Manag. J., 55, 1429, 10.5465/amj.2010.0697 · DOI
  11. De Clercq, 2011, Sustainability in entrepreneurship: a tale of two logics, Int. Small Bus. J., 29, 322, 10.1177/0266242610372460 · DOI
  12. Dimov, 2007, From opportunity insight to opportunity intention: the importance of person-situation learning match, Enterp. Theory Pract., 31, 561, 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2007.00188.x · DOI
  13. Dimov, 2011, Grappling with the unbearable elusiveness of entrepreneurial opportunities, Enterp. Theory Pract., 35, 57, 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00423.x · DOI
  14. Dixon, 2007, Ecopreneurship - a new approach to managing the triple bottom line, J. Organ. Chang. Manag., 20, 326, 10.1108/09534810710740164 · DOI
  15. Dixon-Fowler, 2013, Beyond “Does it Pay to be Green?” A Meta-Analysis of Moderators of the CEP–CFP Relationship, J. Bus. Eth., 112, 353, 10.1007/s10551-012-1268-8 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Fitzsimmons, 2011, Interaction between feasibility and desirability in the formation of entrepreneurial intentions, J. Bus. Ventur., 26, 431, 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2010.01.001 · DOI
  17. Gibbs, 2009, Sustainability entrepreneurs, ecopreneurs and the development of a sustainable economy, Greener Manag. Int., 55, 63
  18. Grandori, 2008, A chemistry of organization: combinatory analysis and design, Organ. Stud., 29, 459, 10.1177/0170840607088023 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Hall, 2010, Sustainable development and entrepreneurship: past contributions and future directions, J. Bus. Ventur., 25, 439, 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2010.01.002 · DOI
  20. Harbi, 2010, Institutions and the shaping of different forms of entrepreneurship, J. Socio-Econ., 39, 436, 10.1016/j.socec.2010.02.011 · DOI
  21. Hart, 2003, Creating sustainable value, Acad. Manag. Exec., 17, 56
  22. Hockerts, 2010, Greening Goliaths versus emerging Davids — theorizing about the role of incumbents and new entrants in sustainable entrepreneurship, J. Bus. Ventur., 25, 481, 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2009.07.005 · DOI
  23. Hostager, 1998, Seeing environmental opportunities: effects of intrapreneurial ability, efficacy, motivation and desirability, J. Organ. Chang. Manag., 11, 11, 10.1108/09534819810369536 · DOI
  24. Isaak, 2002, The making of the Ecopreneur, Greener Manag. Int., 38, 81, 10.9774/GLEAF.3062.2002.su.00009 · DOI
  25. Kane, 1995, Stability of rater leniency: three studies, Acad. Manag. J., 38, 1036, 10.2307/256619 · DOI
  26. Kirzner, 1997, Entrepreneurial discovery and the competitive market process: an Austrian approach, J. Econ. Lit., 35, 60
  27. Kirzner, 2009, The alert and creative entrepreneur: A clarification, Small Bus. Econ., 32, 145, 10.1007/s11187-008-9153-7 · DOI
  28. Klein, 2008, Opportunity discovery, entrepreneurial action, and economic organization, Strateg. Enterp. J., 2, 175, 10.1002/sej.50 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Kuckertz, 2010, The influence of sustainability orientation on entrepreneurial intentions — investigating the role of business experience, J. Bus. Ventur., 25, 524, 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2009.09.001 · DOI
  30. Larson, 2000, Sustainable innovation through an entrepreneurship lens, Bus. Strategy Environ., 9, 304, 10.1002/1099-0836(200009/10)9:5<304::AID-BSE255>3.0.CO;2-O · DOI
  31. Leiserowitz, 2006, Sustainability values, attitudes, and behaviors: a review of multinational and global trends, Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour., 31, 413, 10.1146/annurev.energy.31.102505.133552 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Linnanen, 2002, An insiders experience with environmental entrepreneurship, Greener Manag. Int., 38, 71, 10.9774/GLEAF.3062.2002.su.00008 · DOI
  33. McKelvey, 2004, Towards a complexity science of entrepreneurship, J. Bus. Ventur., 19, 313, 10.1016/S0883-9026(03)00034-X · DOI · Paper page
  34. McMullen, 2014, Time and the entrepreneurial journey: the problems and promise of studying entrepreneurship as a process, J. Manag. Stud., 50, 1481, 10.1111/joms.12049 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Meek, 2010, The impact of social norms on entrepreneurial action: evidence from the environmental entrepreneurship context, J. Bus. Ventur., 25, 493, 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2009.09.007 · DOI · Paper page
  36. Mitchell, 2010, Sustainable market orientation: a new approach to managing marketing strategy, J. Macromark., 30, 160, 10.1177/0276146710361928 · DOI
  37. O'Neill, 2009, The cultural context of sustainability entrepreneurship, Greener Manag. Int., 55, 33
  38. Orsato, 2006, Competitive environmental strategies: when does it pay to be green?, Calif. Manag. Rev., 48, 127, 10.2307/41166341 · DOI
  39. Pacheco, 2010, Escaping the green prison: entrepreneurship and the creation of opportunities for sustainable development, J. Bus. Ventur., 25, 464, 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2009.07.006 · DOI
  40. Parrish, 2010, Sustainability-driven entrepreneurship: principles of organization design, J. Bus. Ventur., 25, 510, 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2009.05.005 · DOI · Paper page
  41. Parrish, 2009, Sustainability entrepreneurship and equitable transitions to a low-carbon economy, Greener Manag. Int., 55, 47
  42. Patzelt, 2010, Recognizing opportunities for sustainable development, Enterp. Theory Pract., 35, 631, 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00386.x · DOI · Paper page
  43. Ragin, 1999, Using qualitative comparative analysis to study causal complexity, Health Serv. Res., 34, 1225
  44. Roxas, 2012, Social desirability bias in survey research on sustainable development in small firms: an exploratory analysis of survey mode effect, Bus. Strateg. Environ., 21, 223, 10.1002/bse.730 · DOI
  45. Schaltegger, 2002, A framework for ecopreneurship, Greener Manag. Int., 38, 45, 10.9774/GLEAF.3062.2002.su.00006 · DOI · Paper page
  46. Schaltegger, 2011, Sustainable entrepreneurship and sustainability innovation: categories and interactions, Bus. Strateg. Environ., 20, 222, 10.1002/bse.682 · DOI · Paper page
  47. Schick, 2002, Sustainability issues for start-up entrepreneurs, Greener Manag. Int., 38, 59
  48. Schlange, 2009, Stakeholder identification in sustainability entrepreneurship: the role of managerial and organisational cognition, Greener Manag. Int., 55, 13
  49. Schneider, 2010, Mapping the institutional capital of high-tech firms: a fuzzy-set analysis of capitalist variety and export performance, J. Int. Bus. Stud., 41, 246, 10.1057/jibs.2009.36 · DOI
  50. Shane, 2000, Prior knowledge and the discovery of entrepreneurial opportunities, Organ. Sci., 11, 448, 10.1287/orsc.11.4.448.14602 · DOI · Paper page
  51. Sharma, 2003, On the path to sustainability: integrating social dimensions into the research and practice of environmental management, Bus. Strateg. Environ., 12, 205, 10.1002/bse.366 · DOI
  52. Shepherd, 2005, Prior knowledge, potential financial reward, and opportunity identification, Entrep. Theory Pract., 29, 91, 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2005.00071.x · DOI · Paper page
  53. Shepherd, 2011, The new field of sustainable entrepreneurship: studying entrepreneurial action linking “what is to be sustained” with “what is to be developed”, Enterp. Theory Pract., 35, 137, 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00426.x · DOI · Paper page
  54. Shepherd, 2013, “I Care about Nature, but …”: Disengaging Values in Assessing Opportunities that Cause Harm, Acad. Manag. J., 56, 1251, 10.5465/amj.2011.0776 · DOI · Paper page
  55. Shepherd, 2009, Measuring the values that underlie sustainable development: the development of a valid scale, J. Econ. Psychol., 30, 246, 10.1016/j.joep.2008.08.003 · DOI
  56. Spence, 2010, Sustainable entrepreneurship: is entrepreneurial will enough? A north–south comparison, J. Bus. Ethics, 99, 335, 10.1007/s10551-010-0656-1 · DOI · Paper page
  57. Tilley, 2009, Introduction - Greener Management International Issue 55, Greener Manag. Int., 55, 5
  58. Tilley, 2009, Sustainability entrepreneurs: could they be the true wealth generators of the future?, Greener Manag. Int., 55, 79
  59. Van de Ven, 2004, Event- and outcome-driven explanations of entrepreneurship, J. Bus. Ventur., 19, 343, 10.1016/S0883-9026(03)00035-1 · DOI · Paper page
  60. Venkataraman, 2012, Reflections on the 2010 AMR Decade Award: whither the promise? Moving forward with entrepreneurship as a science of the artificial, Acad. Manag. Rev., 37, 21
  61. Walley, 2002, Opportunists, champions, mavericks…? A typology of green entrepreneurs, Greener Manag. Int., 38, 31, 10.9774/GLEAF.3062.2002.su.00005 · DOI
  62. Wheeler, 2005, Creating sustainable local enterprise networks, MIT Sloan Manag. Rev., 47, 33
  63. Young, 2006, Can businesses move beyond efficiency? The shift toward effectiveness and equity in the corporate sustainability debate, Bus. Strateg. Environ., 15, 402, 10.1002/bse.510 · DOI · Paper page
  64. York, 2010, The entrepreneur–environment nexus: Uncertainty, innovation, and allocation, J. Bus. Ventur., 25, 449, 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2009.07.007 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 366

Metadata

Authors
Muñoz, P., & Dimov, D.
Venue
Journal of Business Venturing
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-07
Volume
30
Issue
4
Pages
632-654
ISSN
0883-9026 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.jbusvent.2014.07.012
OpenAlex
W2026683609
Cited by
366
References
11
FWCI
36.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.