Cited by 15Academic and Historical Perspectives in PsychologyPhilosophy and History of SciencePhilosophy, Science, and History

Pragmatism, realism, and psychology: Understanding theory selection criteria

Long, Douglas M.·2013·Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jcbs.2013.09.003

Cites

84 of 84 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The strategy of requiring falsifiable hypotheses is not emphasized within functional contextualism, the philosophy underlying the PF model.

    “What is interesting about this strategy is that it reflects the current, dominant, realist “paradigm” and is not the primary strategy emphasized in the Skinnerian operant approach, nor is it emphasized within the approach of functional contextualism, the philosophy underlying the PF model.2,5”
  • The strategy of requiring falsifiable hypotheses reflects the current dominant realist paradigm.

    “What is interesting about this strategy is that it reflects the current, dominant, realist “paradigm” and is not the primary strategy emphasized in the Skinnerian operant approach, nor is it emphasized within the approach of functional contextualism, the philosophy underlying the PF model.2,5”
  • The strategy of requiring falsifiable hypotheses is not the primary strategy emphasized in the Skinnerian operant approach.

    “What is interesting about this strategy is that it reflects the current, dominant, realist “paradigm” and is not the primary strategy emphasized in the Skinnerian operant approach, nor is it emphasized within the approach of functional contextualism, the philosophy underlying the PF model.2,5”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 86 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Long, D. M.
Affiliations
University of Nevada, Reno (US)
Corresponding author
Long, Douglas M.
Venue
Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-10
Volume
2
Issue
3-4
Pages
61-67
ISSN
2212-1447 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2041624782
Cited by
15
References
86
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2
FWCI
5.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › General Psychology › Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy and History of Science
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy, Science, and History
Keywords
pragmatism, realism, philosophy of science, scientific progress, construct validity, psychometric validity, unification of theories, contextual behavioral science, philosophy of psychology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review