Cited by 53Cystic Fibrosis Research AdvancesMedication Adherence and ComplianceInhalation and Respiratory Drug Delivery

Adherence to nebulised therapies in adolescents with cystic fibrosis is best on week-days during school term-time

Open access
Ball, Rosemary, Southern, Kevin W., McCormack, Pamela, Duff, Alistair J.A., Brownlee, Keith G., McNamara, Paul S.·2013·Journal of Cystic Fibrosis

Abstract

Objectives Treatment regimen for families of children with cystic fibrosis (CF) is considerable, particularly when nebulised therapies for chronic Pseudomonas aeruginosa airway infection are prescribed. Adherence to these regimens is variable, particularly in adolescence. Previously, we reported children to be more adherent in evenings compared to mornings, suggesting an association with time-pressure. The aim of this study was to determine whether adherence would be better in adolescent patients at weekends and during school holidays when time-pressures may be less.Study design 24 patients (14 male, median [range] age 13.9 [11.1-16.8] years) were enrolled from two regional paediatric CF centres in the United Kingdom. Data for a full scholastic year, were downloaded openly from a breath-activated data logging nebuliser (I-neb™). Adherence (% of doses taken÷expected number) was calculated during term-times, holidays, weekends and weekdays, for each patient.Results Large variations in adherence were seen between patients. However, adherence during term-time was significantly better than holidays (p<0.001). Weekday adherence was better than weekend adherence in term-time but not holidays. Interestingly, patients prescribed three daily treatments took on average 1.4 treatments/day, a similar number to those prescribed two daily treatments.Conclusion Overall adherence to inhaled therapies was reasonable, but significantly reduced during holiday periods. This suggests a need for families to have not only time, but also structure in their daily routine to maintain optimal adherence to long-term therapies. It is important for CF teams to appreciate these factors when supporting families.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jcf.2012.12.012

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Trials using objective recorded measures suggest that adherence to inhaled therapies in people with CF is around 65% to 67% in children or adolescents.

    “and 65% to 67% in children or adolescents (Ball 2013;McNamara 2009).”
  • Objective adherence data collected using date-and time-logging nebulisers have demonstrated that, amongst adolescents with CF, adherence to inhaled therapies is greater on school days compared to weekends or holidays.

    “Objective adherence data, collected using date-and time-logging nebulisers, have demonstrated that, amongst adolescents with CF, adherence to inhaled therapies is greater on school days compared to weekends or holidays (Ball 2013), despite this being a time when adolescents are likely to be busiest and are therefore more susceptible to miss treatments due to burden (Hoo 2017).”
  • The results may be consistent with previous research highlighting the role of habit on adherence to inhaled therapies in people with cystic fibrosis, and with the suggestion that habit may attenuate the relationship between treatment complexity and perceived treatment burden.

    “This may be consistent with previous research highlighting the role of habit on adherence to inhaled therapies in people with CF (Arden 2019;Ball 2013;Hoo 2017;Hoo 2019a), and the suggestion that habit (i.e.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ball, R., Southern, K. W., McCormack, P., Duff, A. J. A., Brownlee, K. G., & McNamara, P. S.
Affiliations
  • Leeds General Infirmary (GB)
  • University of Liverpool (GB)
Corresponding author
McNamara, Paul S.
Venue
Journal of Cystic Fibrosis
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-09
Volume
12
Issue
5
Pages
440-444
ISSN
1569-1993 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2168257476
Cited by
53
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 2
FWCI
5.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Cystic Fibrosis (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Cystic Fibrosis Research Advances
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Medication Adherence and Compliance
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Inhalation and Respiratory Drug Delivery
Keywords
medication adherence, adolescents, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, school holidays, weekends, time pressure, daily routine, inhalation therapy
MeSH terms
Assessment of Medication Adherence, Adolescent, Child, Cystic Fibrosis, Female, Humans, Male, Nebulizers and Vaporizers, Respiratory Therapy, Retrospective Studies, Schools, Drug Monitoring, Medication Adherence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review